Value normalization in decision making: theory and evidence

Curr Opin Neurobiol. 2012 Dec;22(6):970-81. doi: 10.1016/j.conb.2012.07.011. Epub 2012 Aug 29.

Abstract

A sizable body of evidence has shown that the brain computes several types of value-related signals to guide decision making, such as stimulus values, outcome values, and prediction errors. A critical question for understanding decision-making mechanisms is whether these value signals are computed using an absolute or a normalized code. Under an absolute code, the neural response used to represent the value of a given stimulus does not depend on what other values might have been encountered. By contrast, under a normalized code, the neural response associated with a given value depends on its relative position in the distribution of values. This review provides a simple framework for thinking about value normalization, and uses it to evaluate the existing experimental evidence.

Publication types

  • Research Support, N.I.H., Extramural
  • Research Support, U.S. Gov't, Non-P.H.S.
  • Review

MeSH terms

  • Choice Behavior / physiology
  • Decision Making / physiology*
  • Humans
  • Models, Psychological*
  • Psychological Theory*
  • Psychometrics / methods*
  • Sensation / physiology*