Abstract
Rats lived continuously in an operant chamber in which they were able to press a bar to obtain food on a chained FR50:CRF schedule that allowed them control of both the size and frequency of individual meals. Independent groups of animals were scheduled to receive 12, 24, 48, or 96 electric shocks per day, which were given randomly in time and independent of the subjects’ behavior. Rats could avoid shock by remaining in a safe area of the chamber, but they were always at risk while barpressing. The introduction of shock resulted in a number of changes in feeding patterns. In rats exposed to a possible 12 shocks/day, meal size increased whereas meal frequency changed very little. At 24 shocks/day, meal frequency decreased whereas meal size increased such that net intake remained stable relative to a preshock baseline period. As shock density was increased to 48 or 96 shocks/day, total intake was suppressed. At 96 shocks/day, both meal frequency and meal size decreased dramatically. Shock-related changes were also observed in rates of operant responding and in the amount of time the animals engaged in feeding-related behavior. All of the animals were able to achieve a greater than 50% reduction in the total number of shocks received relative to equivalent random samples of their position in the apparatus taken during baseline. These results support the position that the nature of defensive changes in feeding behavior that are seen when an aversive stimulus is introduced: into a simulated foraging situation varies as a function of risk.
Article PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Bolles, R. C., &Riley, A. L. (1973). Freezing as an avoidance response: Another look at the operant-respondent distinction.Learning & Motivation,4, 268–275.
Collier, G. H. (1983). Life in a closed economy: The ecology of learning and motivation. In M. D. Zeiler & P. Harzem (Eds.),Advances in analysis of behavior: Biological factors in learning (pp. 223–274). Chichester, U.K.: Wiley.
Collier, G. H., Hirsch, E., &Hamun, P. (1972). The ecological determinants of reinforcement in the rat.Physiology & Behavior,9, 705–716.
Fanselow, M. S., &Lester, L. S. (1988). A functional behavioristic approach to aversively motivated behavior: Predatory imminence as a determinant of the topography of defensive behavior. In R. C. Bolles & M. D. Beecher (Eds.),Evolution & learning (pp. 185–211). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Fanselow, M. S., Lester, L. S., &Helmstetter, F. J. (1988). Changes in feeding and foraging as an antipredator defensive strategy: A laboratory simulation using aversivè stimulation in a closed economy.Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior,50, 361–374.
Hursh, S. J. (1980). Economic concepts for the analysis of behavior.Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior,34, 435–452.
Johnson, K. G., &Cabanac, M. (1982). Homeostatic competition between food intake and temperature regulation in rats.Physiology & Behavior,28, 675–679.
Krebs, J. R. (1980). Optimal foraging, prédation risk and territory defence.Ardea,68, 83–90.
Krebs, J. R., &Davies, N. B. (Eds.) (1981).Behavioral ecology. Sunderland, MA: Sinauer.
Lester, L. S., &Fanselow, M. S. (1992). Nocturnality as a defensive behavior in the rat: An analysis in terms of selective association between light and aversive stimulation.Psychological Record,42, 221–253.
LoLordo, V. M. (1979). Selective associations. In A. Dickinson & R. A. Boakes (Eds.),Mechanisms of learning and motivation (pp. 367–398). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Rovee-Collier, C., Capatides, J. B., Fagen, J. W., &Negri, V. (1983). Selective habituation of defensive behavior: Evidence for predator-prey synchrony.Animal Learning & Behavior,11, 127–133.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Additional information
This research was supported by NIMH Grant MH39786 to M.S.F., who is now in the Department of Psychology at UCLA.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Helmstetter, F.J., Fanselow, M.S. Aversively motivated changes in meal patterns of rats in a closed economy: The effects of shock density. Animal Learning & Behavior 21, 168–175 (1993). https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03213397
Received:
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03213397