Abstract
Previous studies have found that the effect of a tilted frame on egocentric rod adjustments is greater when an overhead display in a horizontal plane is viewed from a supine body position than when a vertical display is viewed from an erect body position. The present studies were designed to see whether this phenomenon could be attributed to an intravisual orientation contrast effect or to the effects of visually induced eye torsion. No significant erect-supine differences were found on measures of either effect. Errors in the direction of frame tilt were significantly greater in the supine position when observers were asked to align a visible rod or an unseen hand-held disk with the head, but no effect of body position was found in matching the orientation of the disk with the rod. The data suggest that erect-supine differences in frame effects are not attributable simply to intravisual factors. The results are discussed in terms used by Harris (1974) to describe “straight-ahead shifts” in judging spatial directions with respect to the median plane.
Article PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Brosgole, L., &Cristal, R. M. The role of phenomenal displacement on the perception of the visual upright.Perception & Psychophysics, 1967,2, 179–188.
Carpenter, R. H. S.. &Blakemore, C. Interactions between orientations in human vision.Brain Research, 1973,18, 287–303.
Crone, R. A. Optically induced eye torsion II: Optostatic and optokinetic cycloversion.Albrecht von Graefes Archiv Klinische und Experimentelle Ophthalmologie, 1975,196, 1–7.
Finke, R. A., &Held, R. State reversals of optically induced tilt and torsional eye movements.Perception & Psychophysics, 1978,23, 337–340.
Glick, J. An experimental analysis of subject-object relationships in perception. In S. Wapner & B. Kaplan (Eds.),Essays in honor of Heinz Werner. Worcester, Mass: Clark University Press, 1966.
Gogel, W. C., &Newton, R. E. Depth adjacency and the rod-and-frame illusion.Perception & Psychophysics, 1975,18, 163–171.
Goodenough, D. R., Oltman, P. K., Sigman, E., Rosso, J., &Mertz, H. Orientation contrast effects in the rod-and-frame test.Perception & Psychophysics, 1979,25, 419–424.
Goodenough, D. R., Sigman, E., Oltman, P. K., Rosso, J., &Mertz, H. Eye torsion in response to a tilted visual stimulus.Vision Research, 1979,19, 1177–1179.
Harris, C. W. Beware of the straight-ahead shift-A nonper-ceptual change in experiments on adaptation to displaced vision.Perception, 1974,3, 461–476.
Howard, I. P., &Evans, J. A. The measurement of eye torsion.Vision Research, 1963,3, 447–455.
Hughes, P. C. The influence of the visual field upon the visual vertical in relation to ocular torsion of the eye (Doctoral dissertation, University of Oklahoma, 1973).Dissertation Abstracts International, 1973,33, 4686B. (University Microfilms No. 73-9158)
Lichtenstein, J. H., &Saucer, R. T. Visual dependency in the erect and supine positions.Journal of Applied Psychology, 1974,59, 529–531.
Sigman, E., Goodenough, D. R., &Flannagan, M. Instructions, illusory self-tilt, and the rod-and-frame test.Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 1979,31, 155–165.
Templeton, W. B. Visual normalization: The method of kinesthetic matching.Perception & Psychophysics, 1972,12, 422–424.
Templeton, W. B. The role of gravitational cues in the judgment of visual orientation.Perception & Psychophysics, 1973,14, 451–457.
Wallace, G. K., &Moulden, B. The effect of body tilt on the Zöllner illusion.Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 1973,25, 10–21.
Witkin, H. A., Dyk, R. B., Faterson, H. F., Goodenough, D. R., &Karp, S. A.Psychological differentiation. Potomac, Md: Erlbaum, 1974. (Originally published by Wiley, 1962.)
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Additional information
This work was conducted with the aid of NIMH Grant MH-21989.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Goodenough, D.R., Oltman, P.K., Sigman, E. et al. The rod-and-frame illusion in erect and supine observers. Perception & Psychophysics 29, 365–370 (1981). https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03207346
Received:
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03207346