Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Article
  • Published:

Labelling and optical erasure of synaptic memory traces in the motor cortex

Abstract

Dendritic spines are the major loci of synaptic plasticity and are considered as possible structural correlates of memory. Nonetheless, systematic manipulation of specific subsets of spines in the cortex has been unattainable, and thus, the link between spines and memory has been correlational. We developed a novel synaptic optoprobe, AS-PaRac1 (activated synapse targeting photoactivatable Rac1), that can label recently potentiated spines specifically, and induce the selective shrinkage of AS-PaRac1-containing spines. In vivo imaging of AS-PaRac1 revealed that a motor learning task induced substantial synaptic remodelling in a small subset of neurons. The acquired motor learning was disrupted by the optical shrinkage of the potentiated spines, whereas it was not affected by the identical manipulation of spines evoked by a distinct motor task in the same cortical region. Taken together, our results demonstrate that a newly acquired motor skill depends on the formation of a task-specific dense synaptic ensemble.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Rent or buy this article

Prices vary by article type

from$1.95

to$39.95

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Figure 1: Potentiation-dependent accumulation of AS-PaRac1 to the dendritic spines in hippocampal slice cultures.
Figure 2: Spatiotemporal dynamics of AS-PaRac1 labelling in vivo during the rotarod task.
Figure 3: Selective shrinkage of AS-PaRac1-containing spines upon photoactivation (PA).
Figure 4: Erasure of acquired learning by the photoactivation of spines labelled with AS-PaRac1.
Figure 5: Visualization of synaptic ensembles for distinct learning tasks.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Bernstein, J. G. & Boyden, E. S. Optogenetic tools for analyzing the neural circuits of behavior. Trends Cogn. Sci. 15, 592–600 (2011)

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  2. Tye, K. M. & Deisseroth, K. Optogenetic investigation of neural circuits underlying brain disease in animal models. Nature Rev. Neurosci. 13, 251–266 (2012)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Liu, X. et al. Optogenetic stimulation of a hippocampal engram activates fear memory recall. Nature 484, 381–385 (2012)

    Article  ADS  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  4. Holtmaat, A. & Svoboda, K. Experience-dependent structural synaptic plasticity in the mammalian brain. Nature Rev. Neurosci. 10, 647–658 (2009)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Kasai, H., Fukuda, M., Watanabe, S., Hayashi-Takagi, A. & Noguchi, J. Structural dynamics of dendritic spines in memory and cognition. Trends Neurosci. 33, 121–129 (2010)

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Yuste, R. Dendritic spines and distributed circuits. Neuron 71, 772–781 (2011)

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  7. Murakoshi, H. & Yasuda, R. Postsynaptic signaling during plasticity of dendritic spines. Trends Neurosci. 35, 135–143 (2012)

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  8. Luo, L. et al. Differential effects of the Rac GTPase on Purkinje cell axons and dendritic trunks and spines. Nature 379, 837–840 (1996)

    Article  ADS  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Tashiro, A., Minden, A. & Yuste, R. Regulation of dendritic spine morphology by the rho family of small GTPases: antagonistic roles of Rac and Rho. Cereb. Cortex 10, 927–938 (2000)

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Hayashi-Takagi, A. et al. Disrupted-in-Schizophrenia 1 (DISC1) regulates spines of the glutamate synapse via Rac1. Nature Neurosci. 13, 327–332 (2010)

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Hayashi-Takagi, A. et al. PAKs inhibitors ameliorate schizophrenia-associated dendritic spine deterioration in vitro and in vivo during late adolescence. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 111, 6461–6466 (2014)

    Article  ADS  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  12. Wu, Y. I. et al. A genetically encoded photoactivatable Rac controls the motility of living cells. Nature 461, 104–108 (2009)

    Article  ADS  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  13. Redondo, R. L. & Morris, R. G. Making memories last: the synaptic tagging and capture hypothesis. Nature Rev. Neurosci. 12, 17–30 (2011)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Rogerson, T. et al. Synaptic tagging during memory allocation. Nature Rev. Neurosci. 15, 157–169 (2014)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Arnold, D. B. & Clapham, D. E. Molecular determinants for subcellular localization of PSD-95 with an interacting K+ channel. Neuron 23, 149–157 (1999)

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Kobayashi, H., Yamamoto, S., Maruo, T. & Murakami, F. Identification of a cis-acting element required for dendritic targeting of activity-regulated cytoskeleton-associated protein mRNA. Eur. J. Neurosci. 22, 2977–2984 (2005)

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Steward, O., Wallace, C. S., Lyford, G. L. & Worley, P. F. Synaptic activation causes the mRNA for the IEG Arc to localize selectively near activated postsynaptic sites on dendrites. Neuron 21, 741–751 (1998)

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Steward, O. & Worley, P. F. Selective targeting of newly synthesized Arc mRNA to active synapses requires NMDA receptor activation. Neuron 30, 227–240 (2001)

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Korb, E. & Finkbeiner, S. Arc in synaptic plasticity: from gene to behavior. Trends Neurosci. 34, 591–598 (2011)

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  20. Makino, H. & Malinow, R. Compartmentalized versus global synaptic plasticity on dendrites controlled by experience. Neuron 72, 1001–1011 (2011)

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  21. Zhang, Y., Cudmore, R. H., Lin, D. T., Linden, D. J. & Huganir, R. L. Visualization of NMDA receptor-dependent AMPA receptor synaptic plasticity in vivo. Nature Neurosci. 18, 402–407 (2015)

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Govindarajan, A., Israely, I., Huang, S. Y. & Tonegawa, S. The dendritic branch is the preferred integrative unit for protein synthesis-dependent LTP. Neuron 69, 132–146 (2011)

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  23. Tanaka, J. et al. Protein synthesis and neurotrophin-dependent structural plasticity of single dendritic spines. Science 319, 1683–1687 (2008)

    Article  ADS  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  24. Harvey, C. D. & Svoboda, K. Locally dynamic synaptic learning rules in pyramidal neuron dendrites. Nature 450, 1195–1200 (2007)

    Article  ADS  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  25. Colledge, M. et al. Ubiquitination regulates PSD-95 degradation and AMPA receptor surface expression. Neuron 40, 595–607 (2003)

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  26. Ren, M., Cao, V., Ye, Y., Manji, H. K. & Wang, K. H. Arc regulates experience-dependent persistent firing patterns in frontal cortex. J. Neurosci. 34, 6583–6595 (2014)

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  27. Kawashima, T. et al. Synaptic activity-responsive element in the Arc/Arg3.1 promoter essential for synapse-to-nucleus signaling in activated neurons. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 106, 316–321 (2009)

    Article  ADS  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Yu, X. & Zuo, Y. Spine plasticity in the motor cortex. Curr. Opin. Neurobiol. 21, 169–174 (2011)

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Masamizu, Y. et al. Two distinct layer-specific dynamics of cortical ensembles during learning of a motor task. Nature Neurosci. 17, 987–994 (2014)

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Peters, A. J., Chen, S. X. & Komiyama, T. Emergence of reproducible spatiotemporal activity during motor learning. Nature 510, 263–267 (2014)

    Article  ADS  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Cichon, J. & Gan, W. B. Branch-specific dendritic Ca2+ spikes cause persistent synaptic plasticity. Nature 520, 180–185 (2015)

    Article  ADS  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  32. Hira, R. et al. Transcranial optogenetic stimulation for functional mapping of the motor cortex. J. Neurosci. Methods 179, 258–263 (2009)

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Yang, G., Pan, F. & Gan, W. B. Stably maintained dendritic spines are associated with lifelong memories. Nature 462, 920–924 (2009)

    Article  ADS  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  34. Fu, M., Yu, X., Lu, J. & Zuo, Y. Repetitive motor learning induces coordinated formation of clustered dendritic spines in vivo. Nature 483, 92–95 (2012)

    Article  ADS  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  35. Frey, U. & Morris, R. G. Synaptic tagging and long-term potentiation. Nature 385, 533–536 (1997)

    Article  ADS  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Okada, D., Ozawa, F. & Inokuchi, K. Input-specific spine entry of soma-derived Vesl-1S protein conforms to synaptic tagging. Science 324, 904–909 (2009)

    Article  ADS  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Wang, K. H. et al. In vivo two-photon imaging reveals a role of Arc in enhancing orientation specificity in visual cortex. Cell 126, 389–402 (2006)

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. Schüz, A. & Palm, G. Density of neurons and synapses in the cerebral cortex of the mouse. J. Comp. Neurol. 286, 442–455 (1989)

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. Cauller, L. Layer I of primary sensory neocortex: where top-down converges upon bottom-up. Behav. Brain Res. 71, 163–170 (1995)

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. Laubach, M., Wessberg, J. & Nicolelis, M. A. Cortical ensemble activity increasingly predicts behaviour outcomes during learning of a motor task. Nature 405, 567–571 (2000)

    Article  ADS  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  41. Xu, N. L. et al. Nonlinear dendritic integration of sensory and motor input during an active sensing task. Nature 492, 247–251 (2012)

    Article  ADS  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  42. Larkum, M. E., Nevian, T., Sandler, M., Polsky, A. & Schiller, J. Synaptic integration in tuft dendrites of layer 5 pyramidal neurons: a new unifying principle. Science 325, 756–760 (2009)

    Article  ADS  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  43. Hira, R. et al. Spatiotemporal dynamics of functional clusters of neurons in the mouse motor cortex during a voluntary movement. J. Neurosci. 33, 1377–1390 (2013)

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  44. Andreassi, C. & Riccio, A. To localize or not to localize: mRNA fate is in 3'UTR ends. Trends Cell Biol. 19, 465–474 (2009)

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  45. Wang, D. O., Martin, K. C. & Zukin, R. S. Spatially restricting gene expression by local translation at synapses. Trends Neurosci. 33, 173–182 (2010)

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  46. Holt, C. E. & Schuman, E. M. The central dogma decentralized: new perspectives on RNA function and local translation in neurons. Neuron 80, 648–657 (2013)

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  47. Gray, N. W., Weimer, R. M., Bureau, I. & Svoboda, K. Rapid redistribution of synaptic PSD-95 in the neocortex in vivo. PLoS Biol. 4, e370 (2006)

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  48. Bosch, M. et al. Structural and molecular remodeling of dendritic spine substructures during long-term potentiation. Neuron 82, 444–459 (2014)

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  49. Hsueh, Y. P., Kim, E. & Sheng, M. Disulfide-linked head-to-head multimerization in the mechanism of ion channel clustering by PSD-95. Neuron 18, 803–814 (1997)

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  50. Kasai, H. et al. Learning rules and persistence of dendritic spines. Eur. J. Neurosci. 32, 241–249 (2010)

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We thank H. Bito and H. Okuno for the generous gift of the Arc promoter; F. Murakami for the information about Arc 3′ UTR; M. Yuzaki, K. Inokuchi, and K. Fox for discussions. This research was supported by Grants-in-Aid from the Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science, and Technology (MEXT, Japan; No. 2000009 to H.K. and No. 26221011 to H.K. and A.H.-T., No. 23689055 and No. 24116003 to A.H.-T.), the PRESTO program (JST) to A.H-T., the brain/MIND and SICP projects from Japan Agency for Medical Research and Development (AMED) to H.K., the National Institutes of Health grant GM102924 to K.M.H., NS071216 to Y.I.W. and the Research Grant from the Human Frontier Science Program to H.K., K.M.H. and B.K.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

A.H.-T., S.Y., M.N., and F.S. conducted the experiments. Y.I.W., A.L.L., K.M.H., and B.K. provided technical support for the development of PaRac1. A.H.-T. and H.K. designed the study and wrote the manuscript.

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Akiko Hayashi-Takagi or Haruo Kasai.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing financial interests.

Extended data figures and tables

Extended Data Figure 1 Optimization of the PaRac1 for the synaptic application.

a, Isothermal titration calorimetry (ITC) experiments showing that the introduction of L514K and L531E mutations into the original PaRac1 construct12 reduced binding with the CRIB domain of PAK1 in the dark. The light-insensitive form of LOV2(C450A) and the I539E mutant, which mimics the unfolded ‘lit state’, were used as negative and positive controls, respectively. b, Leaky activity of PaRac1 in the dark. In hippocampal neuronal cultures transfected with the original PaRac1, we observed a bearded appearance of the soma with numerous ectopic dendrites, while neurons transfected with PaRac1 (L514K/L531E) were indistinguishable from normal neurons. c, Assessment of the affinity of PaRac1 to the endogenous PAK1 using a pull-down assay. HEK293 cells, which were transfected with PaRac1–Venus, were divided into two groups: lit and dark. The cells in the lit group were radiated with light with a white fluorescent lamp before cell lysis, and continuous light illumination was present during subsequent immunoprecipitation until the final wash step of protein precipitants. Conversely, cells in the dark group were lit with a yellow fluorescence lamp, which excludes light wavelengths below 500 nm. Co-immunoprecipitation with PAK1 revealed that PaRac1 (L514K/L531E) barely bound with PAK1 in the dark (the number of trials is depicted in the bar graph, **P < 0.01 using the Mann–Whitney U test). d, Targeting of PaRac1 to the postsynaptic density. PSDΔ1.2–PaRac1 (DTE (−) was transfected into dissociated cortical neurons at 21 days in vitro (DIV). Two days after transfection, cells were fixed with 4% PFA, followed by permeabilization for the subsequent immunostaining procedure. Axons and endogenous PSD-95 were visualized using the anti-phospho-neurofilament and anti-PSD-95 antibodies, respectively, revealing that PSDΔ1.2–PaRac1 co-localized with the endogenous PSD-95. Note that PSDΔ1.2-PaRac1 did not co-localize with the axonal marker.

Extended Data Figure 2 The distribution of AS-PaRac1 is regulated by neuronal activity, and is dependent on the dendritic targeting element (DTE).

a, Experimental design. b, Representative image of a cultured hippocampal neuron. c, Bicuculline (BIC) or tetrodotoxin (TTX) was added to the culture media at the designated time points. Images were captured at a high magnification and were tiled to visualize the entire cell. Green circles represent the AS-PaRac1 puncta. d, Quantification of AS-PaRac1 distribution (n = 6 each, *P < 0.05, **P < 0.01 using Kruskal–Wallis test followed by post-hoc Dennett’s test). e, Concomitant accumulation of AS-PaRac1 and SEP–GluA1 in spines. Neurons were co-transfected with mTq (mTurquoise, filler), SEP–GluA1, and AS-PaRac1–mRFP, and the constructs were expressed for 36 h. Potentiated spines during 36 h were shown by SEP–GluA1 fluorescence (arrowheads). Spearman rank correlation revealed a significant correlation between the spine enrichment indices of SEP–GluA1 and AS-PaRac1 (each circle represents one spine, 235 spines, 29 dendrites). f, Schematic of the constructs and representative images of single spine potentiations by glutamate uncaging in the presence of FSK (arrowheads). Rat hippocampal slice cultures were biolistically transfected with either AS-PaRac1 or PSD–PaRac1 (DTE (−)) followed by the uncaging experiments at DIV 13 (equivalent to postnatal day 20). g, Time course of the spine head volume (V) and accumulation of Venus upon uncaging. The mean changes in spine size and Venus accumulation in the stimulated or neighbouring spines are depicted 60 min after uncaging. For quantification, we used pooled data from independent identically designed experiments. The data set for AS-PaRac1 was identical with the FSK-treated group of Fig. 1c–e. Scale bars, 1 μm. *P < 0.05 using the Mann–Whitney U test (n = 6 or 11 dendrites for PSD–PaRac1 or AS-PaRac1, respectively).

Extended Data Figure 3 Putative cellular mechanisms of the specific concentration of AS-PaRac1 in potentiated spines.

a, Uniform labelling of spines with the PSD–PaRac1 construct that lacks DTE of Arc 3′ UTR (Fig. 1a, construct B). PSD–PaRac1 is translated in the soma that is abundantly equipped with translational machineries. Therefore, the somatic protein expression of the probe is high (data not shown), which would outnumber the degradation, and the resulting proteins are transported throughout dendrites. The overflowing probes integrate into the postsynaptic density (PSD) during the constitutive turnover of PSD molecules. Therefore, probe expression is proportional to the spine size. b, Selective labelling of potentiated spines with AS-PaRac1 (Fig. 1a, construct C). The following six mechanisms endow the potentiation-specific labelling with AS-PaRac1. (1) A little somatic translation: the moderate gene expression of AS-PaRac1, by which the translation of AS-PaRac1 protein is limited in the soma (see Extended Data Fig. 2b), and therefore, the non-specific overflow of this probe from the soma into the dendrites is minimal. (2) Dendritic targeting element (DTE): the essential domains of AS-PaRac1 are the N-terminal PSD-95 (PSDΔ1.2) and the 3′ UTR of Arc mRNA (DTE). DTE has a pivotal role in the dendritic targeting of mRNAs44,45. One of the most well-known DTE is present in the Arc mRNA16, which is targeted to stimulated dendritic segments in an activity-dependent manner18. The transport of mRNA out of soma also contributes to the limited translation of the probe in the soma described in (1). In the absence of activation, the limited amount of translational machineries and presence of degradation components in the dendrites maintains the locally translated probe at a low level, which results in a low rate of AS-PaRac1 integration into the PSD during the constitutive turnover of PSD proteins. (3) Local protein synthesis: persistent structural plasticity of the spine depends on the activity-dependent dendritic synthesis of proteins46, and the translation of Arc mRNA is controlled by activity levels19. (4) Effective capturing of PSD proteins in the structurally potentiated spines: the potentiated spine, which rapidly requires new copies of PSD proteins, captures diffusing PSD proteins more efficiently47,48. (5) Increased stability of AS-PaRac1 in the PSD: it is likely that the stability of the PSD-integrated AS-PaRac1 increase, as does the typical PSD scaffold proteins47. The ubiquitination might be underling mechanism of the increased stability, because the ubiquitination site of AS-PaRac1 resides in the N-terminal domain of PSD-95, the domain of which is aggregated to form head-to-head multimerization in the postsynaptic scaffold49. Thus, once AS-PaRac1 is integrated into the PSD, the ubiquitination site may be concealed, and AS-PaRac1 becomes relatively stable. (6) Sensitivity of unbound AS-PaRac1 against the proteasomal degradation: contrary to the PSD-integrated AS-PaRac1, unbound AS-PaRac1 is sensitive to degradation because the ubiquitination site is not concealed. This scenario is supported by the administration of lactacystin (right panel), which inhibits proteasomes and thus completely disrupts the uneven distribution of AS-PaRac1. Similar mechanisms are relevant for newly formed spines, because spine formation is associated with spine enlargement50.

Extended Data Figure 4 Raw data of quantification and synaptic mapping.

Data from Fig. 2. a, Quantification of spine size (based on DsRed fluorescence) and AS-PaRac1 fluorescence after learning are depicted separately based on the classification of spines. The definitions of ‘New spine’, ‘Enlarged spine’ and others are described on the right. Each arrow indicates the trajectory of a spine; beginning and end points represent the absolute values before and after the rotarod task, respectively. b, xy images were captured from the dura to a depth of 300 μm with a step-size of 1.0 µm, and were stacked by the summation of fluorescence values at each pixel. z-stacked images of 10 overlapping fields were aligned to generate the combined images. AS-PaRac1 and AS-PaRac1/DsRed merged images are shown. AS-PaRac1 that was present before learning (−1 day, yellow), appeared shortly after learning (learning period, 0 day, green), 1 day (after-1, +1 day, blue), or 2 days after learning (after-2, +2 day, purple) are depicted to show the spatiotemporal distribution of AS-PaRac1 triggered in each period. c, Time course of the number and fraction of AS-PaRac1-positive spines in each period. d, Calculation of the learning-evoked spine/neuron ratio (%). Example of the calculation is based on the raw data shown in b and c. The table indicates the comparison between neurons in layer II/III (in utero electroporation at E14.5) and layer V (in utero electroporation at E13).

Extended Data Figure 5 Assessment of AS-PaRac1 puncta on the dendritic shaft.

a, The two possible synapse types that AS-PaRac1 puncta may represent on the dendritic shaft. xy images were captured to encompass the entire z-range of the dendrite of interest with a step-size of 0.5 µm, and images were stacked by the summation of fluorescence values at each pixel. The fluorescence of both the filler and AS-PaRac1 would increase, if the AS-PaRac1 punctum emerged on the dendritic spine that undergoes structural potentiation. In contrast, fluorescence of the filler would not increase, if AS-PaRac1 was in the shaft synapse. b, Example of the dendrites before and after the emergence of AS-PaRac1. AS-PaRac1 puncta on the shaft and on the dendritic spine are indicated with (i) and (ii), respectively. The region of interest (ROI) used for the calculation of fluorescence in each punctum is shown. c, Quantification of the fluorescence of the filler and AS-PaRac1 upon the emergence of AS-PaRac1 puncta. Each arrow indicates the trajectory of each ROI; beginning and end points represent the absolute values before and after the emergence of AS-PaRac1, respectively. The ROI at (i) exhibited a concomitant fluorescence increase in both the filler and AS-PaRac1, similar to AS-PaRac1 in a typical dendritic spine (ii). All examined AS-PaRac1 puncta on the dendritic shaft exhibited positive correlations, suggesting that the majority of AS-PaRac1 puncta emerge on the dendritic spine during the structural changes of the spine.

Extended Data Figure 6 Rac1-dependent shrinkage of dendritic spines induced by low-frequency photoactivation.

a, The protocol of photoactivation. Photoactivation was performed in the region that encompasses the branch of interest. b, Neurons in the hippocampal slice culture (DIV 11) were biolistically transfected with DNA constructs shown in the schematic image on the left. Representative dendritic images upon photoactivation are shown on the right. Robust shrinkage (arrowheads) was observed in the spines transfected with AS-PaRac1 driven by the SARE-Arc promoter. Despite their adjacent location to the AS-PaRac1-positive spines, AS-PaRac1-negative spines were not affected by the photoactivation. c, Time course of the spine head volume (V) of Venus-positive (upper panel) and negative spines (lower panel). White, red, and blue circles represent CAG::AS-PaRac1, SARE::AS-PaRac1, and SARE::PSDΔ1.2-LOV-DTE, respectively (n = 12 cells each). d, The mean relative change in spine head size in Venus-positive and negative spines 60 min after photoactivation. Scale bars, 2 μm. *P < 0.05 and ***P < 0.001 according to the Kruskal–Wallis test followed by the post-hoc Scheffé’s test.

Extended Data Figure 7 Spine shrinkage in broad areas of the bilateral motor cortices induced by blue laser illumination.

a, Schematic of the bilateral cranial windows, optical fibres, and the photoactivation protocol. b, Representative images of spine shrinkage in the M1 cortex upon photoactivation in vivo. AS-PaRac1-positive spines (green arrowheads) shrank, while the AS-PaRac1-negative ones (white arrowheads) did not. Quantification of spine size is shown on the right. c, The mean number of AS-PaRac1 puncta per fields was calculated in mice shown in the Fig. 4i. d, e, Spine structure and AS-PaRac1 were imaged in mice, which were subjected to the re-training and home cage protocols shown in Fig. 5. The majority of AS-PaRac1-positive spines displayed photoactivation-induced shrinkage and subsequent recovery. *P < 0.05 according to the Mann–Whitney U test. f, The success of AAV5 vector injection into the bilateral M1 cortex was confirmed by the presence of mRFP fluorescence after behavioural tests. High efficacy of virus infection in layer II/III and V pyramidal neurons was demonstrated with Emx1 immunostaining, which labels pyramidal neurons. The mice without bilateral mRFP signal in the M1 cortex were excluded from the data analysis.

Extended Data Figure 8 No effect of photoactivation on the locomotor activity of mice.

a, Experimental schedule. The running speed of AS-PaRac1-injected mice in protocol no. 1 (Fig. 4a) was measured with a video-tracking system. To minimize the effect of circadian rhythm on locomotion, mice were tested at the same time of the day before and after photoactivation. b, Representative traces of locomotion and temporal sequences of running speed are depicted. c, Statistical analysis shows that photoactivation has only a negligible effect on running speed.

Extended Data Figure 9 Detailed illustration of the rotarod and beam tasks.

Experimental setup for Fig. 4. a, Experimental flowchart. b, Detailed schedule of the rotarod training/test, locomotion test, and photoactivation. c, To shorten the training time, air puffs were applied to the hind limbs as aversive stimuli to maintain the forward-looking position of mice on the rod, which improved the performance, especially at higher speeds. d, Schematic illustration of the beam test. The test was preceded by a 6-h-long training session that lasted for 2 days.

Extended Data Table 1 Detailed information on sample descriptions and statistics

PowerPoint slides

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Hayashi-Takagi, A., Yagishita, S., Nakamura, M. et al. Labelling and optical erasure of synaptic memory traces in the motor cortex. Nature 525, 333–338 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1038/nature15257

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/nature15257

This article is cited by

Comments

By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.

Search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing