Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Letter
  • Published:

Neural computation of log likelihood in control of saccadic eye movements

Abstract

THE latency between the appearance of a visual target and the start of the saccadic eye movement made to look at it varies from trial to trial to an extent that is inexplicable in terms of ordinary 'physiological' processes such as synaptic delays and conduction velocities. An alternative interpretation is that it represents the time needed to decide whether a target is in fact present: decision processes are necessarily stochastic, because they depend on extracting information from noisy sensory signals1. In one such model2, the presence of a target causes a signal in a decision unit to rise linearly at a rate r from its initial value s0 until it reaches a fixed threshold 0, when a saccade is initiated. One can regard this decision signal as a neural estimate of the log likelihood of the hypothesis that the target is present, the threshold being the significance criterion or likelihood level at which the target is presumed to be present. Experiments manipulating the prior probability of the target's appearing confirm this notion: the latency distribution then changes in the way expected if s0 simply reflects the prior log likelihood of the stimulus.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Rent or buy this article

Prices vary by article type

from$1.95

to$39.95

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Barlow, H. B. Phil. Trans. R. Soc. B290, 71–82 (1980).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Carpenter, R. H. S. in Eye Movements: Cognition and Visual Perception (eds. Fisher, D. F., Monty, R. A. & Senders, J. W.) 237–246 (Lawrence Erlbaum, Hillsdale, 1981).

    Google Scholar 

  3. Fisher, R. A. Metron 1, 3–32 (1921).

    Google Scholar 

  4. Edwards, A. W. F. Likelihood (Cambridge Univ. Press, 1972).

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  5. Robinson, D. A. Kybernetik 14, 71–83 (1973).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Grice, G. R. Psychol. Rev. 75, 359–373 (1968).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Ratcliff, R. Psychol. Rev. 85, 59–108 (1978).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Nazir, T. A. & Jacobs, A. M. Psychol. Res. 53, 281–289 (1991).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Lynch, J. C., Mountcastle, V. B., Talbot, W. H. & Yin, T. C. T. J. Neurophysiol. 40, 362–389 (1977).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Schall, J. D. & Hanes, D. P. Nature 366, 467–469 (1993).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Hanes, D. P., Thompson, K. G. & Schall, J. D. Expl Brain Res. 103, 85–96 (1995).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Fischer, B. & Boch, R. Brain Res. 260, 21–26 (1983).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Fischer, B. & Ramsperger, E. Expl Brain Res. 57, 191–195 (1984).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Wenban-Smith, M. G. & Findlay, J. M. Expl Brain Res. 87, 218–222 (1991).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Schiller, P. H., Sandell, J. H. & Maunsell, J. H. R. J. Neurophysiol. 57, 1033–1049 (1987).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Carpenter, R. H. S. in Contemporary Ocular Motor and Vestibular Research (eds Fuchs, A. F., Brandt, T., Büttner, U. & Zee, D.) 185–187 (Thieme, Stuttgart, 1994).

    Google Scholar 

  17. Fuchs, A. F. J. Physiol., Lond. 191, 609–631 (1967).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Dallos, P. J. & Jones, R. W. IEEE Trans. Autom. Contr. 8, 218–227 (1963).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Carpenter, R. H. S. J. Physiol., Lond. 480, 4P (1994).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Carpenter, R., Williams, M. Neural computation of log likelihood in control of saccadic eye movements. Nature 377, 59–62 (1995). https://doi.org/10.1038/377059a0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/377059a0

This article is cited by

Comments

By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.

Search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing