Abstract
THE latency between the appearance of a visual target and the start of the saccadic eye movement made to look at it varies from trial to trial to an extent that is inexplicable in terms of ordinary 'physiological' processes such as synaptic delays and conduction velocities. An alternative interpretation is that it represents the time needed to decide whether a target is in fact present: decision processes are necessarily stochastic, because they depend on extracting information from noisy sensory signals1. In one such model2, the presence of a target causes a signal in a decision unit to rise linearly at a rate r from its initial value s0 until it reaches a fixed threshold 0, when a saccade is initiated. One can regard this decision signal as a neural estimate of the log likelihood of the hypothesis that the target is present, the threshold being the significance criterion or likelihood level at which the target is presumed to be present. Experiments manipulating the prior probability of the target's appearing confirm this notion: the latency distribution then changes in the way expected if s0 simply reflects the prior log likelihood of the stimulus.
This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution
Access options
Subscribe to this journal
Receive 51 print issues and online access
$199.00 per year
only $3.90 per issue
Rent or buy this article
Prices vary by article type
from$1.95
to$39.95
Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Barlow, H. B. Phil. Trans. R. Soc. B290, 71–82 (1980).
Carpenter, R. H. S. in Eye Movements: Cognition and Visual Perception (eds. Fisher, D. F., Monty, R. A. & Senders, J. W.) 237–246 (Lawrence Erlbaum, Hillsdale, 1981).
Fisher, R. A. Metron 1, 3–32 (1921).
Edwards, A. W. F. Likelihood (Cambridge Univ. Press, 1972).
Robinson, D. A. Kybernetik 14, 71–83 (1973).
Grice, G. R. Psychol. Rev. 75, 359–373 (1968).
Ratcliff, R. Psychol. Rev. 85, 59–108 (1978).
Nazir, T. A. & Jacobs, A. M. Psychol. Res. 53, 281–289 (1991).
Lynch, J. C., Mountcastle, V. B., Talbot, W. H. & Yin, T. C. T. J. Neurophysiol. 40, 362–389 (1977).
Schall, J. D. & Hanes, D. P. Nature 366, 467–469 (1993).
Hanes, D. P., Thompson, K. G. & Schall, J. D. Expl Brain Res. 103, 85–96 (1995).
Fischer, B. & Boch, R. Brain Res. 260, 21–26 (1983).
Fischer, B. & Ramsperger, E. Expl Brain Res. 57, 191–195 (1984).
Wenban-Smith, M. G. & Findlay, J. M. Expl Brain Res. 87, 218–222 (1991).
Schiller, P. H., Sandell, J. H. & Maunsell, J. H. R. J. Neurophysiol. 57, 1033–1049 (1987).
Carpenter, R. H. S. in Contemporary Ocular Motor and Vestibular Research (eds Fuchs, A. F., Brandt, T., Büttner, U. & Zee, D.) 185–187 (Thieme, Stuttgart, 1994).
Fuchs, A. F. J. Physiol., Lond. 191, 609–631 (1967).
Dallos, P. J. & Jones, R. W. IEEE Trans. Autom. Contr. 8, 218–227 (1963).
Carpenter, R. H. S. J. Physiol., Lond. 480, 4P (1994).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Carpenter, R., Williams, M. Neural computation of log likelihood in control of saccadic eye movements. Nature 377, 59–62 (1995). https://doi.org/10.1038/377059a0
Received:
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/377059a0
This article is cited by
-
Semantic congruency modulates the speed-up of multisensory responses
Scientific Reports (2024)
-
Perceptual decisions interfere more with eye movements than with reach movements
Communications Biology (2023)
-
Implicit and explicit learning of Bayesian priors differently impacts bias during perceptual decision-making
Scientific Reports (2021)
-
Proactive and reactive accumulation-to-bound processes compete during perceptual decisions
Nature Communications (2021)
-
A Computational Dual-Process Model of Fixation-Duration Control in Natural Scene Viewing
Computational Brain & Behavior (2021)
Comments
By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.