Pontine and thalamic influences on fluid rewards: III. Anticipatory contrast for sucrose and corn oil
Highlights
► Sham feeding rats show ACEs for both sucrose and corn oil. ► Lesions of the parabrachial nucleus eliminate ACE for both sucrose and corn oil. ► Lesions of the thalamic orosensory area spare sucrose and corn oil ACE. ► Both control and TOAx rats express an ACE, but the pattern between the two differs.
Introduction
In the previous two articles in this series, the results showed a dissociation in the role of the gustatory system in orosensory processing of corn oil. Rats with lesions of the parabrachial nuclei (PBN) exhibited weaker than normal operant responding for corn oil emulsions [1], [2], [28], [29], [30], [31], [32], [34], but learned a condition aversion to corn oil [3]. Similar PBN damage disrupted responding for sucrose in both tasks. Rats with lesions of the thalamic orosensory area (TOA), on the other hand, showed no deficits in responding for sucrose or corn oil during fixed or progressive ratio tasks and they acquired a conditioned aversion to both stimuli. These results did not fully support our initial hypothesis that the gustatory PBN is important for orosensory processing of sucrose but not corn oil, and, conversely, that the TOA is necessary for processing oil but not for sucrose reward.
In the present study, we focused on reward comparison for orosensory sucrose and corn oil using the anticipatory contrast effect (ACE). The same hypothesis was tested, but with respect to relative, rather than absolute, reward value. Again, ACE previously was demonstrated only with real feeding. In order to focus on the orosensory effects of fluid rewards, Experiment 1 first demonstrated that intact sham feeding rats can exhibit ACE for sucrose and corn oil, the latter of which has never been tested. Experiment 2 tested whether PBN lesions block an ACE for sucrose and TOA damage interferes with the parallel effect for oil. A preliminary report of these results was presented at the annual meeting of the Society for the Study of Ingestive Behavior in 2009.
Section snippets
Experiment 1: anticipatory contrast effects in sham feeding rats
Ingestion of one preferred sapid stimulus is affected by the relative value of another such stimulus presented closely in time. This change in responding as a function of experience is referred to as a contrast effect [4]. An anticipatory contrast effect develops when rats suppress intake of a weak stimulus, e.g., 0.15% saccharin or 0.06 M sucrose, as it comes to predict the future availability of a stronger, more preferred, stimulus, e.g., 1.0 M sucrose. The comparison is with intake by rats
Experiment 2: anticipatory contrast effects in lesioned rats
The original hypothesis is that sensory processing of corn oil requires the intraoral trigeminal somatosensory system that bypasses the PBN and projects directly to the thalamus [20]. This hypothesis has been tested after lesions of the PBN and TOA using operant tasks and conditioned taste aversion (CTA). The results provide some support for the hypothesis in that PBN lesions eliminated learning a conditioned aversion to sucrose but not to 100% corn oil and they eliminated operant responding
Summary of parabrachial and thalamic lesion effects
Operant responding, CTA, and ACE were examined in PBNx and TOAx rats to test whether sucrose and corn oil are processed through the same or different orosensory pathways. A summary of the data appears in Table 1. The results confirm that, when sucrose is the stimulus, rats with PBN lesions fail to respond in operant tasks, to learn a CTA, or to demonstrate an ACE. The same PBNx rats, however, licked corn oil emulsions normally during free access. They learned operant tasks for oil emulsions but
Acknowledgments
The authors thank Dr. Chris Freet for writing the computer programs for the ACE experiments, Han Li for making brain lesions, and Kathy Matayas and Nellie Horvath for histology. This study was supported by grant DK079182, DC00240, and DA012473 from the National Institute of Health, as well as a PA State Tobacco Settlement Award.
References (53)
- et al.
Relative hedonic value modulates anticipatory contrast
Physiol Behav
(1994) - et al.
The potency of D-1 and D-2 receptor antagonists is inversely related to the reward value of sham-fed corn oil and sucrose in rats
Pharmacol Biochem Behav
(1990) Trigeminal sensory system
- et al.
Specific neuronal protein: a new tool for histological evaluation of excitotoxic lesions
Physiol Behav
(2002) - et al.
The taste and mechanical response properties of neurons in the parvicellular part of the thalamic posteromedial ventral nucleus of the rat
Neurosci Res
(1985) - et al.
Projections of thalamic gustatory and lingual areas in the rat
Brain Res
(1975) Synaptic relationships between the ascending trigeminal fibers and the third order lingual relay neurons of the rat thalamus
Exp Neurol
(1975)- et al.
Gustatory cortex in the rat. II. Thalamocortical projections
Brain Res
(1986) - et al.
Gustatory cortex in the rat. I. Physiological properties and cytoarchitecture
Brain Res
(1986) - et al.
Texture coding in the whisker system
Curr Opin Neurobiol
(2010)
Concentration-dependent licking of sucrose and sodium chloride in rats with parabrachial gustatory lesions
Physiol Behav
Nucleus accumbens dopamine depletions make animals highly sensitive to high fixed ratio requirements but do not impair primary food reinforcement
Neuroscience
Pontine and thalamic influences on fluid rewards: I. Operant responding for sucrose and corn oil
Physiol Beahv
Lesions of the parabrachial nuclei, but not the orosensory thalamus, disrupt operant responding for sucrose and corn oil in rats. in abstract 197.20
Pontine and thalamic influences on fluid rewards: II. Sucrose and corn oil conditioned aversion
Physiol Beahv
Incentive relativity
Anticipation of incentive gain
Anim Learn Behav
Anticipatory contrast as a measure of time horizons in the rats: some methodological determinants
Anim Learn Behav
Negative anticipatory contrast and preference conditioning: flavor cues support preference conditioning, and environmental cues support contrast
J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process
Anticipatory contrast: within-subjects analysis
Anim Learn Behav
Investigation of the devaluation interpretation of anticipatory negative contrast
J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process
Decremental carryover effects of sucrose ingestion in the negative anticipatory contrast procedure in rats
J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process
Deprivation state and temporal horizons in anticipatory contrast
J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process
Successive, simultaneous, and anticipatory contrast in the consumption of saccharin solutions
J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process
Sham feeding corn oil increases accumbens dopamine in the rat
Am J Physiol Regul Integr Comp Physiol
Oral sucrose stimulation increases accumbens dopamine in the rat
Am J Physiol Regul Integr Comp Physiol
Cited by (6)
Altered reward sensitivity to sucrose outcomes prior to drug exposure in alcohol preferring rats
2024, Pharmacology Biochemistry and BehaviorRelative reward effects on operant behavior: Incentive contrast, induction and variety effects
2015, Behavioural ProcessesCitation Excerpt :A key property of motivated behavior is flexibility in the production of goal-directed actions (Toates, 1986; Dunham, 1968; Premack, 1959). Internal and external factors combine to influence flexible responding to changes in reward value (Premack, 1962; Grigson et al., 1994; Cromwell et al., 2005; Papini and Pellegrini, 2006; Liang et al., 2012). Incentive contrast paradigms have been utilized extensively to examine factors involved in the dynamic processes of choice, preference and decision-making (Reynolds, 1961; Eisenberger et al., 1975; Blough, 1980; Flaherty, 1996).
Satb2 neurons in the parabrachial nucleus mediate taste perception
2021, Nature CommunicationsDrug-Motivated behavior in rats with lesions of the thalamic orosensory area
2016, Behavioral NeuroscienceThalamic contribution to cortical processing of taste and expectation
2013, Journal of Neuroscience