Elsevier

NeuroImage

Volume 95, 15 July 2014, Pages 326-329
NeuroImage

Comments and Controversies
Do we need to revise the tripartite subdivision hypothesis of the human subthalamic nucleus (STN)?

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2014.03.010Get rights and content

Highlights

  • The tripartite hypothesis of the STN is questioned.

  • Functional and clinical imaging data on the tripartite STN are limited.

  • We propose a partial overlap between functional zones within the STN.

Abstract

The exciting development of ultra-high resolution 7 Tesla (T) magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) has made it possible to clearly visualize and delineate the subthalamic nucleus (STN). Ultra-high resolution MRI provides a first step in the ongoing improvement of imaging techniques rendering it likely that in the near future specific subareas of small brain nuclei such as the STN can be visualized. These developments can contribute to improve clinical imaging, allowing even more accurate targeting of the STN. This is interesting in view of putative limbic, associative, and sensomotoric subdivisions within the STN. The concept of anatomically distinct subdivisions is attractive, both from an anatomical as well as a clinical perspective. However, we argue that the current leading hypothesis of three STN subdivisions is based on low numbers of clinical observations and primate tracing studies. 7 T imaging provides us with markers that could potentially help us to distinguish subdivisions, but our preliminary findings do not indicate the existence of subdivisions. In our opinion additional research is needed. As a consequence the tripartite hypothesis should therefore still be a topic of debate. In view of the possible clinical implications, we would like to raise the question whether anatomical evidence on the topological organization within the STN points towards delineated subdivisions, or an organization without strict anatomical boundaries or septa. The latter would require a revision of the current tripartite hypothesis of the human STN.

Section snippets

Acknowledgments

The authors would like to thank Max C Keuken for valuable discussions. This research line is financially supported by the European Research Council (313481) (BUF), and the Dutch Brain Foundation (AA and BUF).

References (45)

Cited by (34)

  • Topographic connectivity and cellular profiling reveal detailed input pathways and functionally distinct cell types in the subthalamic nucleus

    2022, Cell Reports
    Citation Excerpt :

    Information flow from the cortex to the BGs is believed to progress through a hierarchical series of sensorimotor, association, and limbic areas, supporting the tripartite STN model (Lambert et al., 2012; Mallet et al., 2007; Parent and Hazrati, 1995; Plantinga et al., 2018). However, much of the data leading to this view regarding the subdivisions of the STN are qualitative, variable, fragmented, and difficult to reconcile because of the technical limitations of neuroanatomical research (Alkemade and Forstmann, 2014; Keuken et al., 2012; Lambert et al., 2015). Therefore, to update this view of the STN, we first performed an inclusive analysis at the level of region-to-region connectivity of the HPSTN.

  • Imaging of the human subthalamic nucleus

    2021, Handbook of Clinical Neurology
    Citation Excerpt :

    A large proportion of the STN voxels contained mixed connection profiles corresponding to limbic, associative, and motor functions of the STN. The question rises whether this could be attributed to partial volume effects, or whether connection profiles are highly intermixed within the STN (Alkemade and Forstmann, 2014). Further development of DWI techniques is needed to resolve this question.

  • Subthalamic deep brain stimulation identifies frontal networks supporting initiation, inhibition and strategy use in Parkinson's disease

    2020, NeuroImage
    Citation Excerpt :

    First, the structural network measures may allow a more fine-grained measurement of the association between brain and behaviour than the STN subregion data. This is because the STN has an overlapping topography with boundaries that are defined heuristically rather than according to tight criteria (Alkemade and Forstmann, 2014). In order words, the ‘motor’ subregion will undoubtedly contain some connections to ‘associative’ cortical regions and vice versa.

  • Altered functional connectivity of the subthalamic nucleus during self-initiated movement in Parkinson's disease

    2018, Journal of Neuroradiology
    Citation Excerpt :

    We chose the bilateral STN as the ROIs for our functional connectivity analysis. Although controversial [27,28], extensive evidence suggests that the STN contains sensorimotor, associative, and limbic subregions [29–33]. Given the focus of the present study on the motor-related network, we selected the sensorimotor subregions of the bilateral STN as ROIs.

View all citing articles on Scopus
View full text