Review
fMRI studies of eye movement control: Investigating the interaction of cognitive and sensorimotor brain systems

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2007.03.018Get rights and content

Abstract

Functional neuroimaging studies of eye movement control have been a useful approach for investigating the interaction of cognitive and sensorimotor brain systems. Building on unit recording studies of behaving nonhuman primates and clinical studies of patients with a focal brain lesion, functional neuroimaging studies have elucidated a pattern of hierarchical organization through which prefrontal and premotor systems interact with sensorimotor systems to support context-dependent adaptive behavior. Studies of antisaccades, memory-guided saccades, and predictive saccades have helped clarify how cognitive brain systems support contextually guided and internally generated action. The use of cognitive and sensorimotor eye movement paradigms is being used to develop a better understanding of life span changes in neurocognitive systems from childhood to late life, and about behavioral and systems-level brain abnormalities in neuropsychiatric disorders.

Introduction

Behavioral studies of eye movement control in the laboratory environment have provided many important insights into how the brain integrates perception and action planning. This line of work was initiated and it continues to be actively pursued in studies of behaving nonhuman primates (Goldberg et al., 1990, Hikosaka et al., 1998, Munoz and Everling, 2004). Studies with monkeys, together with findings from clinical studies of patients with focal brain lesions, created a rich framework in using functional neuroimaging for further developing the understanding of visuomotor systems in the primate brain.

Early work in this area sought to map regions in the human brain that are functionally homologous to those that had been well characterized in the monkey based on neuronal stimulation and unit recording studies (Bruce and Goldberg, 1985). One initial unexpected finding from this work was the repeated demonstration that the human frontal eye field (FEF) appeared to be located in the precentral sulcus, more posterior than where earlier electrical stimulation studies during neurosurgery had placed the region (Luna et al., 1998). The consistency of the observation of FEF localization eventually led to consensus about the issue, though controversy remains about potential functional differences between the dorsomedial and ventrolateral aspects of the precentral sulcus. Cytoarchitectural studies eventually determined cellular-level commonalities between this area of the precentral sulcus (Rosano et al., 2003) and prior reports from monkey FEF (Stanton et al., 1989). Importantly, the study of Rosano et al. (2003) on neurofilament protein stains showed that layer IV of the prefrontal cortex was evident back to the rostral rim of the dorsal precentral sulcus, which is consistent with monkey studies localizing the FEF at the junction of premotor and prefrontal cortex.

Another line of work showed further consistency in organization of monkey and human FEF, and illustrated the potential contribution of very high resolution functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) studies for finely mapping functionally distinct brain regions. Primates use two kinds of eye movements for foveating objects of interest, each supported by different neural systems. Saccadic eye movements are used to rapidly shift gaze between static objects of interest, while smooth pursuit eye movements allow the eyes to sustain focus on slowly moving objects. In the monkey brain, the smooth pursuit and saccade regions of FEF are spatially segregated, with the pursuit area located at the fundus of the arcuate sulcus and the saccade region along the rostral wall (MacAvoy et al., 1991). Early human fMRI studies, conducted at lower spatial resolution, failed to separate these regions which appeared to have extensive overlap (Berman et al., 1999, Petit et al., 1997). Rosano et al. (2002) used high-resolution fMRI (0.8 mm × 1.6 mm in-plane resolution) to demonstrate a specific pattern of activity in the precentral sulcus with a saccade region along the rostral wall and a pursuit area near the fundus. This pattern parallels the organization of FEF in the monkey arcuate sulcus.

Other studies have contributed to the localization of other oculomotor areas in the human brain including lobules VI and VII in the cerebellar hemispheres, the oculomotor cerebellar vermis, the supplementary eye fields (SEF), along the medial wall in the interhemispheric fissure rostral to the supplementary motor area (SMA) and caudal to the presupplementary motor area, and the parietal eye fields in the posterior aspect of the intraparietal sulcus (Simo et al., 2005). The parietal areas are important for spatial attention and spatial coordinate transformations (Merriam et al., 2001), and areas in the cerebellum are important for motor learning (Desmurget et al., 2000).

When shifts of gaze need to be initiated based on contextual cues, additional neural regions are recruited to support saccade initiation. Heteromodal neocortical regions support such higher-level cognitive abilities (Miller and Cohen, 2001), although the striatum and more prototypically sensorimotor regions are also critically important for supporting the cognitive control of gaze (Hikosaka et al., 2000).

One widely used task for evaluating the voluntary control of saccades is the antisaccade paradigm. During antisaccade trials, subjects are instructed to generate a saccade to the mirror location of a peripheral target. This requires subjects to suppress the “visual grasp reflex” to look to a suddenly appearing target, and instead shift gaze away in the opposite direction. Different neural circuitries are now believed to support these two different task requirements.

Neurophysiology and human lesion data indicate that activity in dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (DLPFC) is involved in the inhibitory component of antisaccade tasks. Some DLPFC neurons fire specifically to anti-cues (Funahashi et al., 1993b). Hasegawa et al. (2004) identified a class of “don't look” cells in prefrontal cortex which were associated specifically with anti-targets. Also, high rates of failure to suppress saccades to targets are found in patients with DLPFC lesions, but not those with lesions of the frontal and parietal cortical eye fields (Gaymard et al., 1999).

Functional brain imaging studies also indicate a DLPFC involvement in response inhibition on anti-tasks, including those using positron emission tomography (PET) (O'Driscoll et al., 1995, Sweeney et al., 1996), fMRI (DeSouza et al., 2003; McDowell et al., 2002), and electro- and magneto-encephalography (EEG/MEG) (Matthews et al., 2002, McDowell et al., 2005). Of importance, this inhibition-related DLPFC activity appears to precede response generation and is specific to trials where subjects correctly perform the anti-saccade task (Ford et al., 2005, Matthews et al., 2002, McDowell et al., 2005).

The exact computations supported by DLPFC relevant for correct antisaccade task performance remain to be specified. DLPFC is known to be involved in integrating perception and action planning by, for instance, using learned rules to guide behavior (for review see Bunge, 2004). Thus, antisaccade-related DLPFC activity may be contributing to the response selection process (Miller and Cohen, 2001). DLPFC activity during such tasks may support a preparatory set to suppress saccades to new targets (DeSouza et al., 2003, Luna et al., 2002). There is also evidence for increased activity associated with correct antisaccade trials in the vicinity of FEF (specifically the dorsomedial FEF), SEF, presupplementary eye fields (pre-SEF), and anterior cingulate cortex (Curtis and D'Esposito, 2003, Gaymard et al., 1998). The anterior cingulate is most likely involved with conflict detection and error monitoring during such tasks (Polli et al., 2005).

The internal coordinate system transformation and then use of that transformation to generate a saccade away from the target may depend on posterior parietal cortex (Zhang and Barash, 2000), while the volitional saccade generation process during anti-saccade tasks appears to depend primarily on dorsomedial FEF and SEF (McDowell et al., 2005). Efforts to clarify what brain regions are involved in the coordinate transformation process for antisaccades will benefit greatly from multimodal neuroimaging studies (fMRI and MEG/EEG), and translational research involving single-unit data from behaving nonhuman primates. Ultimately, this line of work will help explain how prefrontal systems interact with sensorimotor systems in a hierarchical manner to support behavioral flexibility and context-appropriate adaptive behavior.

ODR paradigms (also referred to as memory guided saccade tasks) are used to assess maintenance processes in spatial working memory. During ODR tasks, subjects are instructed to remember the location of a briefly presented visual target through a delay period during which the visual cue is no longer present, and then later initiate a saccade to the remembered location. Neurophysiological evidence from monkey studies indicates that DLPFC supports ODR performance (Funahashi et al., 1993a). In humans, lesions of DLPFC disrupt the ability to perform this task (Pierrot-Deseilligny et al., 1993). Imaging studies demonstrate increased activity in DLPFC associated with performance on delayed response tasks (Camchong et al., 2006; Keedy et al., 2006).

Similar to the antisaccade task, DLPFC circuitry supports the ability to properly perform ODR tasks, working in an integrated way with sensorimotor areas in the cortical eye fields to support correct ODR performance (Berman and Colby, 2002, Sweeney et al., 1996). The supplementary eye field appears to play an especially significant role in the initiation of memorized sequences of saccades (Heide et al., 2001). On the one hand, the overlap in the distributed basal ganglia–thalamocortical circuitry supporting both antisaccade and ODR performances may be a manifestation of common visuospatial attention demands of both tasks (Corbetta, 1998). On the other hand, there are indications that areas in DLPFC, FEF, parietal eye fields and extrastriate areas are supporting specific cognitive operations in these two tasks (Berman and Colby, 2002, Curtis and D'Esposito, 2006). How DLPFC and sensorimotor control regions work in unison to support component cognitive operations of working memory tasks is an active area of research.

Visually tracking a stimulus that repeatedly alternates between two or three fixed positions at a fixed time interval has been used as a paradigm for evaluating motor or procedural learning. Subjects quickly learn the predictability of the target motion and generate anticipatory saccades that are initiated before illumination of the next target. Rapid changes in the brain circuitry supporting the shift from visually guided to anticipatory/predictive saccades over a period of seconds is a form of learning that is amenable to investigation in a single fMRI study (Simo et al., 2005).

Single-unit studies show that greater FEF activity before a predictive/anticipatory saccade is associated with shorter saccadic reaction times (Everling and Munoz, 2000), and patients with FEF lesions have difficulty generating anticipatory saccades (Rivaud et al., 1994). PET studies (O'Driscoll et al., 2000) showed changes in FEF, SEF, and extrastriate areas during predictive tasks. In an fMRI study of saccades to predictable targets, Gagnon et al. (2002) reported that FEF activity was greater during predictive tracking when compared with fixation or visually guided saccades, and that FEF activity increased over time as the predictability became apparent. In a study describing the functional dissociation between lateral and medial FEF, Simo et al. (2005) contrasted a predictive saccade task with known timing and direction with an unpredictable visually guided saccade task. During predictive tracking, there was more activity in pre-SMA, prefrontal, inferior parietal and anterior cingulate cortices, and in dorsomedial thalamus and hippocampus, and less activity in occipital cortex, superior parietal lobule and medial FEF. These data are consistent with a lateral–medial FEF distinction made in a recent fMRI study contrasting activity between new and familiar saccade sequences (Grosbras et al., 2001, McDowell et al., 2005). Thus, saccades to predictable target appearance, generated by learned cognitive plans rather than sensorimotor systems responding to the appearance of a visual stimulus, show a fundamentally different pattern of brain activation.

The learning of saccade sequences invokes procedural learning and a change from sensory- to memory-driven neural circuitry. Research has focused on the role of SEF in these tasks because supplementary motor regions are important for motor sequence learning. In monkeys, presaccadic firing of SEF cells changes with the rank order of a saccade within a sequence (Isoda and Tanji, 2002). Lesions of SEF result in difficulty generating saccade sequences. Petit et al., 1996, Petit et al., 1997 showed that learned saccade sequences were associated with increased sequence-related activity in SEF, intraparietal cortex, superior frontal sulcus, and precuneus. A more recent fMRI study (Grosbras et al., 2001), which was designed to emphasize the transition from sensory- to memory-driven circuitry, juxtaposed well practiced with newly acquired saccade sequences. The data showed greater activity associated with newly learned sequences in precuneus and pre-SEF, an area that may be of greatest importance in facilitating sequence acquisition.

Cognitive control underlying problem solving and reasoning abilities continues to develop during adolescence supported by improvements in voluntary response suppression (Fischer et al., 1997) and working memory (Zald, 1998). These improvements occur concurrently with brain maturational changes, including synaptic pruning (Huttenlocher, 1990) and myelination (Yakovlev and Lecours, 1967), which support efficient neuronal processing and functional integration. These changes in brain maturation occur throughout association areas of neocortex.

The development of noninvasive fMRI provided an approach for advancing understanding of the neural basis of cognitive development. Cognitive studies have focused on the late development of prefrontal cortex during adolescence because of its importance in supporting response suppression and working memory abilities, processes that can be assessed with the antisaccade and ODR tasks, respectively. Recent fMRI studies indicate that enhancements in widely distributed integrated brain systems are crucial for the development of prefrontal functions. Behavioral and neuroimaging studies have begun to delineate the trajectories of these developmental improvements and provide evidence for changes in brain function with maturity.

Voluntary response suppression, the ability to filter out distracters and retain a preferred response set, is crucial for choosing optimal responses based on a cognitive plan over task-irrelevant alternatives (Dempster, 1992). Voluntary response suppression develops throughout childhood and adolescence. While neuropsychological studies typically have indicated improvements through childhood (Levin et al., 1991, Luciana and Nelson, 1998), oculomotor tasks have shown continued maturation of the capacity for voluntary response suppression well into adolescence (Fischer et al., 1997).

Several studies with large samples have now characterized performance in the antisaccade task from childhood through early adulthood. The latency to initiate an antisaccade, i.e. to suppress a saccade to a target and plan/decide to initiate a saccade away from the target, decreases with age and matures through adolescence (Fischer et al., 1997, Fukushima et al., 2000, Luna et al., 2004, Munoz et al., 1998). Decreases in response latency continue until 25 years of age, and intersubject variability also decreases in response latency stabilized at approximately 20 years of age (Fischer et al., 1997).

The ability to suppress a saccade to a visual target also shows dramatic developmental improvement in adolescence (Fischer et al., 1997, Fukushima et al., 2000, Luna et al., 2004, Munoz et al., 1998). Studies have found improvements from childhood, when subjects fail to suppress saccades to visual targets on approximately 50–60% of trials, to early adulthood when subjects make errors on only 10–20% errors (Fischer et al., 1997, Luna et al., 2004). Error performance decreases until approximately age 15 and then stabilizes (Luna et al., 2004).

fMRI studies have begun to provide a characterization of the maturation of neural systems supporting antisaccade performance through development. Only one fMRI study to date has investigated developmental changes (ages 8–30) in brain function underlying improvements in antisaccade performance (Luna et al., 2001). All age groups demonstrated recruitment of a widely distributed circuitry including the frontal, supplementary, and parietal eye fields, dorsolateral prefrontal cortex, thalamus, and striatum. Children showed selective increases of activity in posterior parietal regions including the supramarginal gyrus, suggesting a reliance on visuospatial and attention processing rather than frontal lobe systems for voluntary behavioral planning. Adolescents, who performed similarly to adults, demonstrated greater activation of DLPFC and striatum than did the adults, suggesting that a greater effort or computational activity is necessary for them to perform this task at adult levels. These results suggest that, from childhood to adolescence, there is increased recruitment of prefrontal cortex to regulate sensorimotor systems in a hierarchical manner, similar to what has been found in other developmental fMRI studies of response suppression using neuropsychological tasks (Bunge et al., 2002, Casey et al., 1997). Only adults recruited the lateral cerebellum, which supports cognitive processes related to timing and learning, and is known to interact with prefrontal systems to support enhanced performance on some higher cognitive tasks (Kim et al., 1994).

Studies of elderly adults have also been conducted and reveal age-related declines in behavioral performance. Sweeney et al. (2001) found that performance on visually guided saccade and antisaccade tasks was poorer in elderly (age 65–80) than young adults. In an fMRI study, Raemaekers et al. (2006b) found that relationships between frontal and parietal eye fields were altered during visually guided saccades in adults between the ages 55–72 relative to young individuals.

The developmental emergence of working memory is believed to underlie age-related improvements in many complex mental abilities. Working memory capacity improves through childhood and adolescence as reflected by improvements in memory span (Dempster, 1981), working memory for spatial locations (Swanson, 1999), manipulating and retaining visual information (Davidson et al., 2006), retaining information on orientation of a pattern of figures (Huizinga et al., 2006), and the ability to maintain and manipulate multiple spatial units (Luciana et al., 2005). In cross-sectional laboratory studies in which participants performed an ODR task, the accuracy of responses continued to improve into adulthood, showing adult levels of performance at approximately 19 years of age.

A widely distributed brain circuitry is known to underlie spatial working memory. Several fMRI studies have begun to explore the changes in brain function underlying developmental improvements in working memory (Olesen et al., 2006, Nelson et al., 2000, Scherf et al., 2006). These studies used tasks requiring that subjects retain a spatial location or a sequence of non-spatial stimuli in memory and use this information to guide a future response. Findings suggest a transition from reliance on striatal regions in childhood to a more widely distributed circuitry including prefrontal, premotor, and posterior parietal regions in adolescence. In an fMRI study of subjects between the ages of 8–47 using the ODR task, a shift from dependence on caudate nucleus and anterior insula in childhood to increased reliance on DLPFC and premotor regions was found. In that study, in adulthood, findings indicated a decreased reliance on DLPFC and the recruitment of regions that are not primary to working memory, but that may enhance performance, including ventrolateral prefrontal cortex and the supramarginal gyrus (Scherf et al., 2006).

Taken together, developmental fMRI studies using oculomotor tasks have been informative about important developmental changes in cognitive and brain function. Notably, as the brain matures, more widely distributed circuitry appears to be recruited that may reflect increased functional integration in brain systems with resulting computational efficiencies (Sweeney et al., 2004).

Laboratory studies document abnormalities of oculomotor control in several neurological and psychiatric disorders. The extensive knowledge about cognitive and sensorimotor control in the oculomotor system has provided a useful foundation for using functional brain imaging for learning about abnormalities in brain disorders that are related to these impairments. Examples include a reduced accuracy of memory guided saccades on the ODR task in autism (Minshew et al., 1999), and speeded saccade latencies in acutely ill medication-naïve first-episode schizophrenia patients that normalize with atypical antipsychotic medication (Reilly et al., 2005). A worsening of ODR impairments and an improvement in antisaccade performance have been reported in treatment naïve first episode schizophrenia patients after antipsychotic treatment (Harris et al., 2006, Reilly et al., 2006).

The illness most studied in fMRI eye movement paradigms to date is schizophrenia. This is reflected in the literature with laboratory studies of eye movement abnormalities as well. Interest of psychiatric researchers in oculomotor measurements in part reflects the need for sensitive quantitative approaches for investigating the more subtle brain changes associated with serious mental illness than with many neurological disorders. In smooth pursuit paradigms, differences have been found between schizophrenia patients and healthy individuals in brain areas that generate extraretinal signals predicting target velocity, which are needed to accurately match eye to target velocity (Nagel et al., 2007). In studies of medicated patients, Tregellas et al. (2004) and Hong et al. (2005) found a lower level of activation in schizophrenia patients in frontal eye fields and anterior cingulate. Hong et al. (2005) also reported reduced activation in supplemental eye fields and posterior superior temporal cortex. Both studies further reported greater pursuit-related activation in medial occipital–temporal areas, as Lencer et al. (2005) described in extrastriate area MT. Keedy et al. (2006) examined an unmedicated first-episode schizophrenia patient sample during a smooth pursuit task in an fMRI study, and found reduced neocortical activation in several areas including frontal eye fields, supplementary eye fields, parietal eye fields, cingulate cortex, and precuneus.

Results from fMRI studies of schizophrenia patients performing visually guided saccade tasks follow a similar pattern of possible treatment effects. In unmedicated first-episode patients, Keedy et al. (2006) reported widespread reductions of task-related activation in frontal, supplementary, and parietal eye fields, cingulate cortex and precuneus, whereas studies of medicated schizophrenia patients have been equivocal. Raemaekers et al. (2002) reported similar but less extensive relative reductions in schizophrenia patients, and McDowell et al. (2002) reported no differences. These data, paralleling data with pursuit tasks, suggest that medication or enhanced psychological adjustment associated with clinical recovery may tend to normalize brain function related to eye movement control.

Visually guided saccade paradigms have also been used to study other patient groups in fMRI studies. Alzheimer's disease patients displayed reduced right hemisphere dominance in the parietal activations seen in matched healthy older individuals (Thulborn et al., 2000). Autistic adults have also been studied with visually guided saccade paradigms. In a relatively small sample of individuals with autism, Luna et al. (2002) did not find abnormalities in activation during visually guided saccades. However, during the oculomotor delayed response task, where laboratory studies had previously reported behavioral deficits, dorsolateral prefrontal cortex activity was reduced in the individuals with autism. This is consistent with the view that this region is dysfunctional in autism in ways that contribute to working memory deficits in the disorder.

fMRI studies have also shown abnormalities among subjects with schizophrenia during cognitively complex tasks. In an antisaccade task, schizophrenia patients demonstrated less activation in right DLPFC (McDowell et al., 2002). Raemaekers et al. (2006a) reported atypical striatal but not prefrontal activation during an antisaccade task in schizophrenia subjects, but antisaccade-related prefrontal cortex activation was not observed in their healthy controls, suggesting their paradigm did not recruit prefrontal circuitry activation. Both unmedicated (Keedy et al., 2006) and medicated (Camchong et al., 2006) schizophrenia subjects have been studied with the ODR task. Results of these studies demonstrated broadly reduced activation in basal ganglia–thalamocortical regions supporting sensorimotor and attentional components of eye movement control in schizophrenia. Both studies also found evidence of reduced DLPFC activation. While most studies have been conducted with medicated patients, an important avenue of future exploration is the examination of how medications change functional brain systems to improve attentional and other cognitive processes in patients with neuropsychiatric disorders.

Abnormalities observed in schizophrenia patients have been reported in the first-degree family members of patients with schizophrenia who have no personal history of the illness. In studies of smooth pursuit (O'Driscoll et al., 1999), antisaccades (Raemaekers et al., 2006a), and the oculomotor delayed response task (Keshavan et al., 2002), reduced activations in oculomotor circuitry have been reported in unaffected first-degree relatives of schizophrenia patients. However, abnormalities are generally attenuated relative to findings in the patients. Overall, this work suggests that eye movement paradigms may be elucidating pathophysiology in functional neural systems that is associated with familial liability, and that fMRI studies of oculomotor function in patient populations have promise to provide new insights into the pathology underlying complex brain disorders.

Section snippets

Conclusions

Studies of eye movement control provide a promising approach for learning about sensorimotor and cognitive aspects of reflexive and voluntary action planning. Translational laboratory studies have provided considerable information about behavioral aspects of these systems. fMRI studies provide a noninvasive approach for learning about the brain systems that support these sensorimotor and cognitive functions. Importantly, this body of work can contribute significantly to the understanding of how

References (85)

  • M. Huizinga et al.

    Age-related change in executive function: developmental trends and a latent variable analysis

    Neuropsychologia

    (2006)
  • P.R. Huttenlocher

    Morphometric study of human cerebral cortex development

    Neuropsychologia

    (1990)
  • S.K. Keedy et al.

    Functional magnetic resonance imaging studies of eye movements in first episode schizophrenia: smooth pursuit, visually guided saccades and the oculomotor delayed response task

    Psychiatry Res.

    (2006)
  • M.S. Keshavan et al.

    A preliminary functional magnetic resonance imaging study in offspring of schizophrenic parents

    Prog. Neuro-psychopharmacol. Biol. Psychiatry

    (2002)
  • R. Lencer et al.

    Reduced neuronal activity in the V5 complex underlies smooth-pursuit deficit in schizophrenia: evidence from an fMRI study

    NeuroImage

    (2005)
  • M. Luciana et al.

    The functional emergence of prefrontally-guided working memory systems in four- to eight-year-old children

    Neuropsychologia

    (1998)
  • B. Luna et al.

    Maturation of widely distributed brain function subserves cognitive development

    NeuroImage

    (2001)
  • J.E. McDowell et al.

    Neural correlates of refixation saccades and antisaccades in normal and schizophrenia subjects

    Biol. Psychiatry

    (2002)
  • E.P. Merriam et al.

    Stimulus–response incompatibility activates cortex proximate to three eye fields

    NeuroImage

    (2001)
  • M. Nagel et al.

    Different extraretinal neuronal mechanisms of smooth pursuit eye movements in schizophrenia: An fMRI study

    Neuroimage

    (2007)
  • M. Raemaekers et al.

    Brain activation during antisaccades in unaffected relatives of schizophrenic patients

    Biol. Psychiatry

    (2006)
  • J.L. Reilly et al.

    Abnormalities in visually guided saccades suggest corticofugal dysregulation in never-treated schizophrenia

    Biol. Psychiatry

    (2005)
  • C. Rosano et al.

    The human precentral sulcus: chemoarchitecture of a region corresponding to the frontal eye fields

    Brain Res.

    (2003)
  • J.A. Sweeney et al.

    Inhibitory control of attention declines more than working memory during normal aging

    Neurobiol. Aging

    (2001)
  • R.A. Berman et al.

    Cortical networks subserving pursuit and saccadic eye movements in humans: an fMRI study

    Hum. Brain Mapp.

    (1999)
  • C.J. Bruce et al.

    Primate frontal eye fields: I. Single neurons discharging before saccades

    J. Neurophysiol.

    (1985)
  • S.A. Bunge

    How we use rules to select actions: a review of evidence from cognitive neuroscience

    Cogn. Affect. Behav. Neurosci.

    (2004)
  • B.J. Casey et al.

    A developmental functional MRI study of prefrontal activation during performance of a go–no-go task

    J. Cogn. Neurosci.

    (1997)
  • M. Corbetta

    Frontoparietal cortical networks for directing attention and the eye to visual locations: identical, independent, or overlapping neural systems?

    Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.

    (1998)
  • C.E. Curtis et al.

    Success and failure suppressing reflexive behavior

    J. Cogn. Neurosci.

    (2003)
  • C.E. Curtis et al.

    Selection and maintenance of saccade goals in the human frontal eye fields

    J. Neurophysiol.

    (2006)
  • F.N. Dempster

    Memory span: sources of individual and developmental differences

    Psychol. Bull.

    (1981)
  • M. Desmurget et al.

    Functional adaptation of reactive saccades in humans: a PET study

    Exp. Brain Res.

    (2000)
  • J.F. DeSouza et al.

    Preparatory set associated with pro-saccades and anti-saccades in humans investigated with event-related fMRI

    J. Neurophysiol.

    (2003)
  • S. Everling et al.

    Neuronal correlates for preparatory set associated with pro-saccades and anti-saccades in the primate frontal eye field

    J. Neurosci.

    (2000)
  • K.A. Ford et al.

    Neural processes associated with antisaccade task performance investigated with event-related fMRI

    J. Neurophysiol.

    (2005)
  • S. Funahashi et al.

    Dorsolateral prefrontal lesions and oculomotor delayed-response performance: evidence for mnemonic “scotomas”

    J. Neurosci.

    (1993)
  • S. Funahashi et al.

    Prefrontal neuronal activity in rhesus monkeys performing a delayed anti-saccade task

    Nature

    (1993)
  • D. Gagnon et al.

    The effect of spatial and temporal information on saccades and neural activity in oculomotor structures

    Brain

    (2002)
  • B. Gaymard et al.

    Effects of anterior cingulate cortex lesions on ocular saccades in humans

    Exp. Brain Res.

    (1998)
  • B. Gaymard et al.

    Cortical control of saccades

    Exp. Brain Res.

    (1999)
  • M.E. Goldberg et al.

    Representation of visuomotor space in the parietal lobe of the monkey

    Cold Spring Harbor Symp. Quant. Biol.

    (1990)
  • Cited by (69)

    • A group comparison in fMRI data using a semiparametric model under shape invariance

      2022, Computational Statistics and Data Analysis
      Citation Excerpt :

      We then analyzed 20 ROIs related to saccades and cognitive control circuitry as defined in Dyckman et al. (2007) and displayed in Table 3 and Fig. 14 in the Appendix. Imaging studies examining humans have repeatedly and reliably highlighted brain regions, including these 20 ROIs, related to the sensorimotor and cognitive control processes associated with saccade tasks (Munoz and Everling, 2004; Sweeney et al., 2007; McDowell et al., 2008; Krafft et al., 2012). Previous studies that examined differences in neural activation between pro and antisaccade tasks have used similar task-relevant ROIs (Dyckman et al., 2007; Rodrigue et al., 2016); these ROIs are representative of the subcortical and cortical components required for reflexive and volitional saccades.

    • Clinical Strategies and Technical Challenges in Psychoradiology

      2020, Neuroimaging Clinics of North America
      Citation Excerpt :

      A quiet ready room is helpful for preparing patients for examination and a mock scanner may be helpful to prepare patients. Magnetic resonance (MR)-compatible monitoring devices, such as an eye tracking system, are useful not only for monitoring patient safety but also for monitoring head position and collecting data about eye movements that have an impact on fMRI data.11–13 Usually, the time for 1 MR examination is best limited to 40 minutes to 60 to maintain patient comfort and safety and optimize acquired image quality.

    • Using an emotional saccade task to characterize executive functioning and emotion processing in attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder and bipolar disorder

      2018, Brain and Cognition
      Citation Excerpt :

      Cognitive control and emotion processing systems share complex and reciprocal interactions in the brain which are necessary for goal-directed behavior (Kanske, 2012; Mueller, 2011; Uekermann, Abdel-Hamid, Lehmkämper, Vollmoeller, & Daum, 2008). Saccade tasks provide a sensitive means of engaging both of these systems: regions of the oculomotor circuit, such as the dlPFC, FEF, SEF, PEF, basal ganglia, and thalamus are also involved in cognitive control (Bari & Robbins, 2013; Rubia et al., 2006; Sweeney, Luna, Keedy, McDowell, & Clementz, 2007), and have reciprocal connections with subcortical emotion circuits, which have been suggested to influence the preparation and execution of saccades when emotional stimuli are incorporated into the paradigm (Kissler & Keil, 2008; West, Al-Aidroos, Susskind, & Pratt, 2011). The paradigm used here therefore provides a novel way to probe the integrity of both executive functioning and emotion processing in ADHD and BD, two disorders which have been previously characterized by dysregulation of the dlPFC, amygdala, and basal ganglia (Blumberg & Leung, 2003; Giedd et al., 2001; Hakvoort Schwerdtfeger et al., 2013; Hart et al., 2013; Phillips & Swartz, 2014; Pompei, Dima, Rubia, Kumari, & Frangou, 2011; Schulz et al., 2014; Strakowski et al., 2005).

    View all citing articles on Scopus
    View full text