Elsevier

Neuroscience Letters

Volume 396, Issue 1, 20 March 2006, Pages 17-22
Neuroscience Letters

Neuromagnetic recordings reveal the temporal dynamics of auditory spatial processing in the human cortex

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neulet.2005.11.018Get rights and content

Abstract

In an attempt to delineate the assumed ‘what’ and ‘where’ processing streams, we studied the processing of spatial sound in the human cortex by using magnetoencephalography in the passive and active recording conditions and two kinds of spatial stimuli: individually constructed, highly realistic spatial (3D) stimuli and stimuli containing interaural time difference (ITD) cues only. The auditory P1m, N1m, and P2m responses of the event-related field were found to be sensitive to the direction of sound source in the azimuthal plane. In general, the right-hemispheric responses to spatial sounds were more prominent than the left-hemispheric ones. The right-hemispheric P1m and N1m responses peaked earlier for sound sources in the contralateral than for sources in the ipsilateral hemifield and the peak amplitudes of all responses reached their maxima for contralateral sound sources. The amplitude of the right-hemispheric P2m response reflected the degree of spatiality of sound, being twice as large for the 3D than ITD stimuli. The results indicate that the right hemisphere is specialized in the processing of spatial cues in the passive recording condition. Minimum current estimate (MCE) localization revealed that temporal areas were activated both in the active and passive condition. This initial activation, taking place at around 100 ms, was followed by parietal and frontal activity at 180 and 200 ms, respectively. The latter activations, however, were specific to attentional engagement and motor responding. This suggests that parietal activation reflects active responding to a spatial sound rather than auditory spatial processing as such.

Section snippets

Acknowledgement

This study was supported by the Academy of Finland (Proj. no. 203470, 1201602).

Cited by (40)

  • Frontotemporal network in automatic / pre-attentive detection of abstract change: An event-related optical signal (EROS) study

    2022, Neuropsychologia
    Citation Excerpt :

    Earlier studies suggested a general predictive role of the IFC by showing the IFC's contributions to regularity extraction (Tse et al., 2007, 2012; Vossel et al., 2011) and predictions of action outcomes (Avenanti et al., 2017). Evidence supporting the IFC-STC network in pre-attentive change detection was demonstrated by mismatch responses in both brain regions using electroencephalography with source localization (EEG; Garrido et al., 2008; Yago et al., 2001), magnetoencephalography (MEG; Rinne et al., 2000; Tiitinen et al., 2006; Wacongne et al., 2011), electrocorticography (ECoG; Dürschmid et al., 2016), functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI; Doeller et al., 2003; Molholm et al., 2005; Opitz et al., 2002; Rinne et al., 2005; Schall et al., 2003), positron-emission tomography (PET; Müller et al., 2002) and event-related optical signal (EROS; Tse and Penney, 2007, 2008; Tse et al., 2006, 2013, 2015). EROS captures the change in optical properties associated with neuronal brain response and is able to localize brain responses temporally and spatially in the millisecond and sub-centimeter range, respectively (Gratton and Fabiani, 2010).

  • Hemispheric asymmetry of ERPs and MMNs evoked by slow, fast and abrupt auditory motion

    2016, Neuropsychologia
    Citation Excerpt :

    However, the magnitude of the P2 wave depended on the spatial change pattern: stronger P2 responses were elicited by Step stimuli as compared to those evoked by Slow and Fast motion. This finding is consistent with the results of our previous MMN study (Shestopalova et al., 2015) and corroborate the view that N1 response may encode mostly the sound energy onset, while sound movement processing may be captured by the P2 deflection (Getzmann, 2011; Tiitinen et al., 2006). The Step stimulus represented an infinitely large spatial change per time, so its processing can be interpreted using the concept of a “temporal window”, which implies that the response of the binaural system is based on integration of interaural information across time by a leaky integrator.

  • Monaural and binaural contributions to interaural-level-difference sensitivity in human auditory cortex

    2015, NeuroImage
    Citation Excerpt :

    That hypothesis is also consistent with human lesion studies that demonstrate bilateral localization deficits following right-AC damage, but minimal localization deficits following left-AC damage (e.g., Griffiths et al., 1997; Zatorre and Penhune, 2001; Spierer et al., 2009). Puzzlingly, the opposite pattern (i.e., ipsilateral responses in left but not right AC) has been reported in several MEG-adaptation studies (Palomäki et al., 2005; Tiitinen et al., 2006; Salminen et al., 2010). Briley et al. (2013) employed a continuous stimulation paradigm in which EEG responses were compared across shifts in sound location that varied in magnitude from 0 to 120 degrees azimuth.

  • Complex linguistic rules modulate early auditory brain responses

    2015, Brain and Language
    Citation Excerpt :

    As observed in source reconstruction studies, the MMN is generated by a temporo-frontal network (for a review, see Garrido, Kilner, Stephan, & Friston, 2009). This network includes regions in the temporal lobe – bilateral auditory cortices (Deouell, Bentin, & Giard, 1998; Grau, Fuentemilla, & Marco-Pallarés, 2007; Jemel, Achenbach, Müller, Röpcke, & Oades, 2002; Tiitinen et al., 2006), and prefrontal lobe (e.g., Giard et al., 1990; Opitz, Rinne, Mecklinger, Von Cramon, & Schröger, 2002). Both regions have been shown to contribute to speech sound perception.

View all citing articles on Scopus
View full text