Elsevier

Biological Psychiatry

Volume 77, Issue 10, 15 May 2015, Pages 903-911
Biological Psychiatry

Archival Report
Mesolimbic Dopamine Dynamically Tracks, and Is Causally Linked to, Discrete Aspects of Value-Based Decision Making

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biopsych.2014.10.024Get rights and content

Abstract

Background

To make appropriate choices, organisms must weigh the costs and benefits of potential valuable outcomes, a process known to involve the nucleus accumbens (NAc) and its dopaminergic input. However, it is currently unknown if dopamine dynamically tracks alterations in expected reward value online as behavioral preferences change and if so, if it is causally linked to specific components of value such as reward magnitude and/or delay to reinforcement.

Methods

Electrochemical methods were used to measure subsecond NAc dopamine release during a delay discounting task where magnitude was fixed but delay varied across blocks (n = 7 rats). Next, to assess whether this dopamine signaling was causally related to specific components of choice behavior, we employed selective optogenetic stimulation of dopamine terminals in the NAc using a modified delay discounting task in which both delay and magnitude varied independently (n = 23 rats).

Results

Cues predictive of available choices evoked dopamine release that scaled with the rat’s preferred choices and dynamically shifted as delay to reinforcement for the large reward increased. In the second experiment, dopamine signaling was causally related to features of decision making, as optogenetically enhanced dopamine release within the NAc during predictive cue presentation was sufficient to alter subsequent value-related choices. Importantly, this dopamine-mediated shift in choice was limited to delay-based, but not magnitude-based, decisions.

Conclusions

These findings indicate that NAc dopamine dynamically tracks delay discounting and establishes a causal role for this signaling in a subset of value-based associative strategies.

Section snippets

Behavior

Detailed methods are described in Supplement 1. Briefly, male Sprague Dawley rats (n = 7; Harlan, Indianapolis, Indiana) were trained on a delay discounting task comprised of three trial types. On forced-choice delay trials (Figure 1A, left), a cue light was illuminated for 5 seconds followed by extension of two levers. A single press on the associated lever positioned below that cue light resulted in a large reward (three sucrose pellets) delivered after a period of delay. During forced-choice

Dopamine Signaling Tracks Associative Cue Value Related to Subjective Choice Preferences

During the delay discounting task used with FSCV, rats discriminated the different reward options during both forced- and free-choice trials. On forced-choice trials, rats showed accurate responding (89.6% correct), which was modulated by delay costs (Figure S1A–D in Supplement 1). During free-choice trials, rats’ initial preference for the large-reward lever decreased as delays for that outcome increased across blocks (F2,7 = 21.68, p < .001) (Figure 1B). In the no-delay block, rats strongly

Discussion

The present findings reveal a role for dopaminergic input to the NAc in mediating discrete aspects of value-based decision making. Using FSCV in a delay discounting task where reward magnitudes were constant but delays to reinforcement shifted, dopamine release during predictive cues scaled between differently valued options that reflected information about the rats’ preferred responses in forced-choice trials tracked the value of the preferred choices and was dynamically modulated by delay

Acknowledgments and Disclosures

This research was supported by DA034021 to RMC, DA030307 to JAS, and DA035322 to MPS.

We are grateful for outstanding technical support from Xuefei Wang.

The authors report no biomedical financial interests or potential conflicts of interest.

References (30)

  • W.X. Pan et al.

    Dopamine cells respond to predicted events during classical conditioning: Evidence for eligibility traces in the reward-learning network

    J Neurosci

    (2005)
  • P. Waelti et al.

    Dopamine responses comply with basic assumptions of formal learning theory

    Nature

    (2001)
  • W. Schultz et al.

    A neural substrate of prediction and reward

    Science

    (1997)
  • M.R. Roesch et al.

    Dopamine neurons encode the better option in rats deciding between differently delayed or sized rewards

    Nat Neurosci

    (2007)
  • C.D. Fiorillo et al.

    Discrete coding of reward probability and uncertainty by dopamine neurons

    Science

    (2003)
  • Cited by (82)

    • The effects of early life stress on impulsivity

      2022, Neuroscience and Biobehavioral Reviews
    • Dopamine release in the nucleus accumbens core signals perceived saliency

      2021, Current Biology
      Citation Excerpt :

      Biological evidence for dopamine neurons encoding an RPE signal was first demonstrated by Schultz and colleagues,1 showing increases in dopamine neuron firing rates when an unexpected reward is encountered, a learning-dependent shift in firing to cues that predict reward delivery, and a decrease in firing rates when expected rewards are withheld. Similar outcomes have been observed across species in ventral tegmental area (VTA) cell bodies3,12–15 and in dopamine release in the nucleus accumbens (NAc).4,16–21 As a result, the RPE model of the role of dopamine in learning has been dominant in the field for the last 20 years.

    View all citing articles on Scopus
    1

    Authors MPS and JAS contributed equally to this work.

    View full text