Perceived body position and the visual horizontal
References (27)
Eine scheinbare bedeutende Drehung von Objeckten bei Neigung des Kopfes nach rechts oder links
Virchows Arch.
(1861)Stellungs-, Spannungs- und Lagewahrnehmung
Optic-vestibular orientation to the vertical
- et al.
Subjective postural vertical in peripheral and vestibular disorders
- et al.
The subjective visual vertical as a clinical parameter of vestibular function in peripheral vestibular diseases
J. Vestib. Res.
(1995) Orthogonalität des subjektiven Wahrnehmungsraumes unter Auschluss visueller Stimuli zur Raumorientierung
(1988)- et al.
A novel automatic procedure for measuring ocular counterrolling: A computeranalytical method to determine the eye's roll angle while subjects work on perceptual tasks
Behav. Res. Methods Instrum. Comput.
(1990) - et al.
Computer aided anatomical reconstruction of the shape and the orientation of human utricular and saccular maculae
Soc. Neurosci. Abstr.
(1991) Angular relation of axes in perceptual space
- et al.
Distortions in perception of spatial axis. 32
Elevator illusion: Influences of otolith organ activity and neck proprioception
Percept. Psychophys.
A new method for the anatomical reconstruction of the human macular planes
Acta Otolaryngol. (Stockh.)
Die Stellung der Maculae acusticae im Schädel des Menschen und einiger Säugetiere
Gegenbauers Morphol. Jahrbuch
Cited by (64)
Spatial orientation: Model-based approach to multi-sensory mechanisms
2019, Progress in Brain ResearchCitation Excerpt :At large head tilt angles (> 60°), SVV errors are usually in the same direction of the head tilt, reflecting underestimations of upright orientation relative to the actual head positions (known as the Aubert or A-effect). These systematic errors in spatial orientation do not correspond with the perception of body tilt, which remains fairly accurate at all tilt positions (Bronstein, 1999; Kaptein and Van Gisbergen, 2004; Mast and Jarchow, 1996; Mittelstaedt, 1983; Van Beuzekom et al., 2001; Van Beuzekom and Van Gisbergen, 2000). Such dissociation shows that the spatial orientation is not simply determined by the perception of body position, in line with the multisensory aspect of spatial perception.
How do visual and postural cues combine for self-tilt perception during slow pitch rotations?
2014, Acta PsychologicaCitation Excerpt :With regard to the influence of postural cues, numerous studies have investigated how body tilt itself can modify self-orientation perception. However, the findings have been rather contradictory (Bauermeister, 1964; Carriot, Barraud, Nougier, & Cian, 2006; Ceyte, Cian, Nougier, Olivier, & Trousselard, 2007; Ebenholtz, 1970; Fouque et al., 1999; Mast & Jarchow, 1996). For instance, Fouque et al. (1999) found that pitch body tilt induced a substantial bias in the direction of body tilt for estimation of egocentric eye level (i.e., the plane parallel to the transverse plane of the head, called Head Referenced Eye Level; Stoper & Cohen, 1989), while Carriot et al. (2006) did not.
Postural configuration affects the perception of earth-based space during pitch tilt
2011, Acta PsychologicaCitation Excerpt :Similar interpretation could be given considering the phenomenon of somatosensory adaptation observed after prolonged tilt (Higashiyama & Koga, 1998; Wade, 1970). However, this hypothesis was inconsistent with other studies which found no relationship between the estimated body orientation and the perception of earth-based references (Mast & Jarchow, 1996, Mittelstaedt, 1996; Trousselard, Barraud, Nougier, Raphel, & Cian, 2004). Another interpretation of the relationship observed between body orientation and SVH has been recently suggested in terms of egocentric attraction induced by body tilt (Bringoux et al., 2004, 2008).
Pitch body orientation influences the perception of self-motion direction induced by optic flow
2010, Neuroscience LettersOtolith testing. roll plane disorders
2010, Handbook of Clinical NeurophysiologyCitation Excerpt :Whenever an asymmetry in vestibular tone is present or central vestibular pathways are disturbed, ocular torsion is frequently present and therefore will influence visual line results differently than values obtained from a somatosensory task. SVV measurements in the roll plane traditionally have been assessed in static conditions, i.e. with the head and the body not moving after the roll displacement (Howard, 1982; Mittelstaedt, 1983; Curthoys, 1996; Mast and Jarchow, 1996; Van Beuzekom and Van Gisbergen, 2000; Kaptein and Van Gisbergen, 2004, 2005), but more recently SVV was also studied under dynamic conditions, i.e. with the head and the body moving (Jaggi-Schwarz and Hess, 2003; Pavlou et al., 2003; Kaptein and Van Gisbergen, 2006). Thereby it has been shown that roll errors tended to be smaller when roll motion was above the threshold of the semicircular canals, indicating a dynamic contribution of the SCC to the perception of vertical.
Influence of perceived egocentric coordinates on the subjective visual vertical
2009, Neuroscience Letters