Food reward: Brain substrates of wanting and liking

https://doi.org/10.1016/0149-7634(95)00033-BGet rights and content

Abstract

What are the neural substrates of food reward? Are reward and pleasure identical? Can taste pleasure be assessed in animals? Is reward necessarily conscious? These questions have re-emerged in recent years, and there is now sufficient evidence to prompt re-examination of many preconceptions concerning reward and its relation to brain systems. This paper reviews evidence from many sources regarding both the psychological structure of food reward and the neural systems that mediate it. Special attention is paid to recent evidence from “taste reactivity” studies of affective reactions to food. I argue that this evidence suggests the following surprising possibilities regarding the functional components and brain substrates of food reward. (1) Reward contains distinguishable psychological or functional components—“liking” (pleasure/palatability) and “wanting” (appetite/incentive motivation). These can be manipulated and measured separately. (2) Liking and wanting have separable neural substrates. Mediation of liking related to food reward involves neurotransmitter systems such as opioid and GABA/benzodiazepine systems, and anatomical structures such as ventral pallidum and brainstem primary gustatory relays. Mediation of wanting related to food reward involves mesotelencephalic dopamine systems, and divisions of nucleus accumbens and amygdala. Both liking and wanting arise from vastly distributed neural systems, but the two systems are separable. (3) Neural processing of food reward is not confined to the limbic forebrain. Aspects of food reward begin to be processed in the brainstem. A neural manipulation can enhance reward or produce aversion but no single lesion or transection is likely abolish all properties of food reward. (4) Both wanting and liking can exist without subjective awareness. Conscious experience can distort or blur the underlying reward processes that gave rise to it. Subjective reports may contain false assessments of underlying processes, or even fail at all to register important reward processes. The core processes of liking and wanting that constitute reward are distinct from the subjective report or conscious awareness of those processes.

References (162)

  • M. Cabanac et al.

    Postingestive alliesthesia: The rat tells the same story

    Physiol. Behav.

    (1990)
  • M. Cabanac et al.

    Facial consummatory responses in rats support the ponderostat hypothesis

    Physiol. Behav.

    (1991)
  • M. Cabanac et al.

    Ingestive/aversive response of rats to sweet stimuli. Influence of glucose, oil, and casein hydrolyzate gastric loads

    Physiol. Behav.

    (1992)
  • S.J. Cooper

    Benzodiazepines as appetite-enhancing compounds

    Appetite

    (1980)
  • S.J. Cooper et al.

    Behavioural pharmacology of food, water and salt intake in relation to drug actions at benzodiazepine receptors

    Neurosci. Biobehav. Rev.

    (1985)
  • J.D. Davis et al.

    Analysis of the microstructure of the rhythmic tongue movements of rats ingesting maltose and sucrose solutions

    Behav. Neurosci.

    (1992)
  • A.R. Delamater et al.

    Control of fluid palatability by exteroceptive Pavlovian signals

    J. Exp. Psychol. [Anim. Behav.]

    (1986)
  • A. Drewnowski et al.

    Taste responses and preferences for sweet high-fat foods: Evidence for opioid involvement

    Physiol. Behav.

    (1992)
  • D.E. Edmonds et al.

    Parametric analysis of brain stimulation reward in the rat: III. Effect of performance variables on the reward summation function

    J. Comp. Physiol. Psychol.

    (1974)
  • M. Fantino et al.

    An opioid antagonist, naltrexone, reduces preference for sucrose in humans

    Am. J. Physiol.

    (1986)
  • N. Geary et al.

    Pimozide decreases the positive reinforcing effect of sham fed sucrose in the rat

    Pharmacol. Biochem. Behav.

    (1985)
  • B.A. Gosnell

    Central structures involved in opioid-induced feeding

  • S.E. Gramling et al.

    Some effects of pimozide on nondeprived rats' lever pressing maintained by a sucrose reward in an anhedonia paradigm

    Pharmacol. Biochem. Behav.

    (1987)
  • T. Gray et al.

    Effects of pimozide on lever pressing behavior maintained on an intermittent reinforcement schedule

    Pharmacol. Biochem. Behav.

    (1980)
  • H.J. Grill et al.

    Taste reactivity as a measure of the neural control of palatability

  • H.J. Grill et al.

    The taste reactivity test. II. Mimetic responses to gustatory stimuli in chronic thalamic and chronic decerebrate rats

    Brain Res.

    (1978)
  • H.J. Gundersen et al.

    The new stereological tools: disector, fractionator, nucleator and point sampled intercepts and their use in pathological research and diagnosis

    Apmis

    (1988)
  • A.J. Hill et al.

    Hunger and palatability: Tracking ratings of subjective experience before, during, and after the consumption of preferred and less preferred food

    Appetite

    (1984)
  • R.A. Hinde

    Animal behaviour: a synthesis of ethology and comparative psychology

    (1970)
  • E.A. Kiyatkin et al.

    Electrochemical monitoring of extracellular dopamine in nucleus accumbens of rats lever-pressing for food

    Brain Res.

    (1994)
  • B. Laeng et al.

    Pleasantness of a sweet taste during hunger and satiety: effects of gender and “sweet tooth”

    Appetite

    (1993)
  • R.J. Lamb et al.

    The reinforcing and subjective effects of morphine in post-addicts: a dose-response study

    J. Pharmacol. Exp. Ther.

    (1991)
  • T.I. Lidsky et al.

    A consideration of sensory factors involved in motor functions of the basal ganglia

    Brain Res.

    (1985)
  • H. Looy et al.

    Hedonic response of sucrose likers and dislikers to other gustatory stimuli

    Physiol. Behav.

    (1992)
  • G.P. Mark et al.

    Taste responses in the nucleus tractus solitarius of the chronic decerebrate rat

    Brain Res.

    (1988)
  • G. Mittleman et al.

    The propensity for nonregulatory ingestive behavior is related to differences in dopamine systems: behavioral and biochemical evidence

    Behav. Neurosci.

    (1986)
  • W.J. Nauta et al.

    Afferent and efferent relationships of the basal ganglia

  • L. Parker et al.

    Amphetamine-induced modification of quinine palatability: analysis by the taste reactivity test

    Pharmac. Biochem. Behav.

    (1994)
  • L.A. Parker

    Chlordiazepoxide nonspecifically enhances consumption of saccharin solution

    Pharmacol. Biochem. Behav.

    (1991)
  • L.A. Parker et al.

    Pimozide enhances the aversiveness of quinine solution

    Pharmacol. Biochem. Behav.

    (1990)
  • L.A. Parker et al.

    Morphine- and naltrexone-induced modification of palatability: analysis by the taste reactivity test

    Behav. Neurosci.

    (1992)
  • V.P. Bakshi et al.

    Feeding induced by opioid stimulation of the ventral striatum: Role of opiate receptor subtypes

    J. Pharmacol. Exp. Ther.

    (1993)
  • W.K. Beagley et al.

    Hypothalamic stimulation facilitates contralateral visual control of a learned response

    Science

    (1977)
  • K. Berridge et al.

    Relation of consummatory responses and preabsorptive insulin release to palatability and learned taste aversions

    J. Comp. Physiol. Psychol.

    (1981)
  • K.C. Berridge et al.

    Trigeminal-taste interaction in palatability processing

    Science

    (1985)
  • K.C. Berridge et al.

    Sodium depletion enhances salt palatability in rats

    Behav. Neurosci.

    (1984)
  • K.C. Berridge et al.

    Alternating ingestive and aversive consummatory responses suggest a two-dimensional analysis of palatability in rats

    Behav. Neurosci.

    (1983)
  • K.C. Berridge et al.

    The mind of an addicted brain: Sensitization of wanting versus liking

    Curr. Dir. Psychol. Sci.

    (1995)
  • K.C. Berridge et al.

    What psychological process mediates feeding evoked by electrical stimulation of the lateral hypothalamus?

    Behav. Neurosci.

    (1991)
  • K.C. Berridge et al.

    Taste reactivity analysis of 6-hydroxydopamine-induced aphagia: implications for arousal and anhedonia hypotheses of dopamine function

    Behav. Neurosci.

    (1989)
  • Cited by (1427)

    View all citing articles on Scopus
    View full text