Electrophysiological study of the maturation of auditory responses from the inner ear of the chick
References (38)
- et al.
Role of inner and outer hair cells in coding sound intensity: an ontogenic approach
Brain Research
(1978) Early development of species-specific auditory perception in birds
- et al.
The development of auditory evoked responses in the cochlea and cochlear nuclei of the chick
Brain Research
(1973) - Carlier, E. and Pujol, R., Sectioning the efferent bundle increases the cochlear frequency selectivity, submitted for...
- et al.
Development of cochlear frequency selectivity tested by compound action potential tuning curves
Hearing Res.
(1979) - et al.
The development of hair cells in the embryonic chick's basilar papilla
Acta otolaryngol.
(1978) The Auditory Periphery. Biophysics and Physiology
- et al.
Compound action potential tuning curves
J. Acoust. Soc. Amer.
(1976) - et al.
Properties of auditory nerve responses in absence of outer hair cells
J. Neurophysiol.
(1978) Peripheral coding of auditory communication
The sharpening of cochlear frequency selectivity in the normal and abnormal cochlea
Audiology
The innervation of the developing fowl embryo otocyst in vivo and in vitro
Acta otolaryngol.
Development of Species Identification in Birds: an Inquiry into the Prenatal Determinants of Perception
The ultrastructure of the basilar papilla of the chick
J. comp. Neurol.
Synaptogenesis in the basilar papilla of the chick
J. Neurocytol.
Ontogeny of behavioral responsiveness to sound in the chick embryo as indicated by electrical recordings of motility
J. comp. physiol. Psychol.
Morphogenesis in the Auditory System of the Chicken: a study of Nucleus Magno-cellularis
Cited by (81)
Of mice and chickens: Revisiting the RC time constant problem
2022, Hearing ResearchCitation Excerpt :While SHCs appear to show smaller area toward the base, the membrane capacitance does not show such a trend, likely attributable to the larger surface area of the hair bundle in basal cells (Tan et al., 2013). For this reason, achieving the upper limit of 4 kHz for the chicken (Rebillard and Rubel, 1981) may require an additional mechanism, which improves the quality factor. A mechanism that can enhance high-frequency hearing could be based on the tonotopic organization of the avian ear.
Firing properties of auditory primary afferents from the basilar papilla in the chick
2015, International Journal of Developmental NeuroscienceCitation Excerpt :The main counterexample is that the maturation of the tectorial membrane and the transduction apparatus in the hair cells achieves a mature profile only at around E18-19 (Si et al., 2003). Moreover, it is unlikely that cochlear primary afferent neurons at E16 encode frequency information about sounds of natural environment (Rubel and Rebillard, 1981; Manley et al., 1991; Jones and Jones 2000). Consistent with this idea, Jones et al., (2006) found that in ages younger than E16, cochlear ganglion neurons exhibit a profound insensitivity to sound, given that most cells are unresponsive at sound levels <100 dB SPL.
Differential effects of prenatal chronic high-decibel noise and music exposure on the excitatory and inhibitory synaptic components of the auditory cortex analog in developing chicks (Gallus gallus domesticus)
2014, NeuroscienceCitation Excerpt :Brain samples were collected from embryonic day 16 (E16) and E18 and post hatch day 1 (PH1) chicks. Period between E16 and E18 represents the starting phase of detection and encoding of ambient sound frequency (Rebillard and Rubel, 1981; Jones and Jones, 1995). For Western blotting, real time PCR and NMR spectroscopy, AuL tissues were quickly removed from 4-mm-coronal-thick forebrain sections using a Harris tissue micropunch of 2-mm diameter (Ted Pella Inc, CA, USA).
Auditory capabilities of birds in relation to the structural diversity of the basilar papilla
2011, Hearing ResearchCitation Excerpt :The much shallower high frequency flank of the chicken behavioural audiogram compared to other species is also in contrast to audiograms derived from the compound action potential (CAP). Fig. 7 compares on the left side four behavioural audiograms and shows the corresponding CAP audiograms on the right side (chicken – Rebillard and Rubel, 1981; Patuzzi and Bull, 1991; Salvi et al., 1992, pigeon – Gummer et al., 1987, canary – Gleich et al., 1995, barn owl – Köppl and Gleich, 2007). CAP audiograms typically show higher thresholds as compared to behavioural audiograms, but in general both types of audiograms share basic characteristics, as illustrated in Fig. 7.
Early Development of the Human Auditory System
2011, Fetal and Neonatal Physiology E-Book, Fourth EditionEarly Development of the Human Auditory System
2003, Fetal and Neonatal Physiology: Third Edition
- *
Present address (to which correspondence should be sent): Laboratoire de Neurophysiologie Sensorielle, Universitéde Provence, Centre St. Jéroˆme, 13397 Marseille Cedex 13, France.