Skip to main content
Log in

Purkinje Cell Simple Spike Discharge Encodes Error Signals Consistent with a Forward Internal Model

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
The Cerebellum Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Processing motor errors is essential for online control of goal-directed movements and motor learning. Evidence from psychophysical and imaging studies supports the long-standing view that error processing is central to cerebellar function. The dominant view is that error-related signals are encoded in the complex spike discharge of Purkinje cells. However, the findings are inconsistent on whether complex spike activity correlates with motor errors. Recently, we examined if simple spike firing carries error signals in monkeys trained to manually track a randomly moving target. The task requires continuous processing of motor errors characterized by the relative movements between the hand-driven cursor and the target center. Linear regression models show that error parameters are robustly represented in the simple spike activity of most Purkinje cells. At the single cell level, the error signals are encoded independently and integrated with kinematic signals. In a large majority of Purkinje cells, correlation strengths between the simple spike discharge and an error parameter have bimodal profiles with respect to time, exhibiting a local maxima corresponding to firing leading the behavior and another one corresponding to firing lagging behavior. The bimodal temporal profiles suggest that individual error parameters are dually encoded as both an internal prediction used for feedback-independent, compensatory movements and the actual sensory feedback used to monitor performance. Approximately 75 % of the dual representations have opposing modulations of the simple spike activity, one increasing firing and the other depressing firing, as reflected by the reversed signs of the regression coefficients corresponding to the local maxima of the R 2 profile. These dual representations of individual parameters with opposing modulation of the simple spike firing are consistent with the signals needed to generate sensory prediction errors used to update an internal model.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Shadmehr R, Smith MA, Krakauer JW. Error correction, sensory prediction, and adaptation in motor control. Annu Rev Neurosci. 2010;33:89–108.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Wolpert DM, Ghahramani Z. Computational principles of movement neuroscience. Nat Neurosci. 2000;3(Suppl):1212–7.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Kawato M, Wolpert D. Internal models for motor control. Novartis Found Symp. 1998;218:291–304.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Miall RC, Wolpert DM. Forward models for physiological motor control. Neural Netw. 1996;9:1265–79.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Diedrichsen J, Hashambhoy Y, Rane T, Shadmehr R. Neural correlates of reach errors. J Neurosci. 2005;25:9919–31.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Tseng YW, Diedrichsen J, Krakauer JW, Shadmehr R, Bastian AJ. Sensory prediction errors drive cerebellum-dependent adaptation of reaching. J Neurophysiol. 2007;98:54–62.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Gilbert PF, Thach WT. Purkinje cell activity during motor learning. Brain Res. 1977;128:309–28.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Kitazawa S, Kimura T, Yin PB. Cerebellar complex spikes encode both destinations and errors in arm movements. Nature. 1998;392:494–7.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Ebner TJ, Hewitt A, Popa L. What features of movements are encoded in the discharge of cerebellar neurons during limb movements? Cerebellum. 2011;10:683–93.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Hewitt A, Popa L, Pasalar S, Hendrix CM, Ebner TJ. Representation of limb kinematics in Purkinje cell simple spike discharge is conserved across multiple tasks. J Neurophysiol. 2011;106:2232–47.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Popa LS, Hewitt AL, Ebner TJ. Predictive and feedback performance errors are signaled in the simple spike discharge of individual Purkinje cells. J Neurosci. 2012;32:15345–58.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Shadmehr R, Krakauer JW. A computational neuroanatomy for motor control. Exp Brain Res. 2008;185:359–81.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Pasalar S, Roitman AV, Durfee WK, Ebner TJ. Force field effects on cerebellar Purkinje cell discharge with implications for internal models. Nat Neurosci. 2006;9:1404–11.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Todorov E, Jordan MI. Optimal feedback control as a theory of motor coordination. Nat Neurosci. 2002;5:1226–35.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Marko MK, Haith AM, Harran MD, Shadmehr R. Sensitivity to prediction error in reach adaptation. J Neurophysiol. 2012;108:1752–63.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

We wish to thank Lijuan Zhou and Michael McPhee for technical and graphics support and Kris Bettin for manuscript preparation. This study is supported in part by NIH grants NS18338, NS062158, GM008244, and NS071686.

Conflict of Interest

There are no current or potential conflicts of interest for the three authors, Laurentiu S. Popa, Angela L. Hewitt, and Timothy J. Ebner

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Timothy J. Ebner.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Popa, L.S., Hewitt, A.L. & Ebner, T.J. Purkinje Cell Simple Spike Discharge Encodes Error Signals Consistent with a Forward Internal Model. Cerebellum 12, 331–333 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12311-013-0452-4

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12311-013-0452-4

Keywords

Navigation