Abstract
The direction of ‘up’ has traditionally been measured by setting a line (luminous if necessary) to the apparent vertical, a direction known as the ‘subjective visual vertical’ (SVV); however for optimum performance in visual skills including reading and facial recognition, an object must to be seen the ‘right way up’—a separate direction which we have called the ‘perceptual upright’ (PU). In order to measure the PU, we exploited the fact that some symbols rely upon their orientation for recognition. Observers indicated whether the symbol ‘ ’ presented in various orientations was identified as either the letter ‘p’ or the letter ‘d’. The average of the transitions between ‘p-to-d’ and ‘d-to-p’ interpretations was taken as the PU. We have labelled this new experimental technique the Oriented CHAracter Recognition Test (OCHART). The SVV was measured by estimating whether a line was rotated clockwise or counter-clockwise relative to gravity. We measured the PU and SVV while manipulating the orientation of the visual background in different observer postures: upright, right side down and (for the PU) supine. When the body, gravity and the visual background were aligned, the SVV and the PU were similar, but as the background orientation and observer posture orientations diverged, the two measures varied markedly. The SVV was closely aligned with the direction of gravity whereas the PU was closely aligned with the body axis. Both probes showed influences of all three cues (body orientation, vision and gravity) and these influences could be predicted from a weighted vectorial sum of the directions indicated by these cues. For the SVV, the ratio was 0.2:0.1:1.0 for the body, visual and gravity cues, respectively. For the PU, the ratio was 2.6:1.2:1.0. In the case of the PU, these same weighting values were also predicted by a measure of the reliability of each cue; however, reliability did not predict the weightings for the SVV. This is the first time that maximum likelihood estimation has been demonstrated in combining information between different reference frames. The OCHART technique provides a new, simple and readily applicable method for investigating the PU which complements the SVV. Our findings suggest that OCHART is particularly suitable for investigating the functioning of visual and non-visual systems and their contributions to the perceived upright of novel environments such as high- and low-g environments, and in patient and ageing populations, as well as for normal observers.
Similar content being viewed by others
Notes
The actual font used was sans serif and is illustrated in Fig. 1d.
The luminous line relies on a judgement relative to the axis of gravity. When supine, this is orthogonal to the computer screen which could, therefore, not be measured by this paradigm.
References
Adams WJ, Graf EW, Ernst MO (2004) Experience can change the ‘light-from-above’ prior Nat Neurosci 7:1057–1058
Asch SE, Witkin HA (1948) Studies in space perception. II. Perception of the upright with displaced visual fields and with body tilted J Exp Psychol 38:455–477
Aubert H (1861) Eine scheinbare Drehung von Objekten bei Neigung des Kopfes nach rechts oder links Virchows Archiven 20:381–393
Bischof N (1974) Optic-vestibular orientation to the vertical In: Kornhuber HH (ed) Handbook of sensory physiology Springer Berlin, Heidelberg, New York pp 155–190
Bockisch CJ, Haslwanter T (2001) Three-dimensional eye position during static roll and pitch in humans Vision Res 41:2127–2137
Bronstein AM, Perennou DA, Guerraz M, Playford D, Rudge P (2003) Dissociation of visual and haptic vertical in two patients with vestibular nuclear lesions Neurology 61:1260–1262
Corballis MC, Zbrodoff NJ, Shetzer LI, Butler PB (1978) Decisions about identity and orientation of rotated letters and digits Mem Cognit 6:98–107
Dyde RT, Sadr S, Jenkin MR, Jenkin HL, Harris LR (2004) The perceived direction of “up” measured using a p/d letter probe J Vis 4:385a
Edelman S, Bulthoff HH (1992) Orientation dependence in the recognition of familiar and novel views of three-dimensional objects Vision Res 32:2385–2400
Ernst MO, Banks MS (2002) Humans integrate visual and haptic information in a statistically optimal fashion Nature 415:429–33
Goodenough DR, Sigman E, Oltman PK, Rosso J, Mertz H (1979) Eye torsion in response to a tilted visual stimulus Vision Res 19:1177–1179
Guerraz M, Poquin D, Ohlmann T (1998) The role of head-centric spatial reference with a static and kinetic visual disturbance Percept Psychophys 60:287–295
Harris LR, Dyde RT, Sadr S, Jenkin MR, Jenkin HL (2004) Visual and vestibular contributions to the perceived direction of “up” J Vest Res 14:200–201
Hillis JM, Ernst MO, Banks MS, Landy MS (2002) Combining sensory information: mandatory fusion within, but not between, senses Science 298:1627–1630
Howard IP (1982) Human visual orientation Wiley New York
Howard IP, Childerson L (1994) The contribution of motion, the visual frame, and visual polarity to sensations of body tilt Perception 23:753–762
Howard IP, Templeton WB (1964) Visually-induced eye torsion and tilt adaptation Vision Res 4:433–477
Howard IP, Bergstrom SS, Ohmi M (1990) Shape from shading in different frames of reference Perception 19:523–530
Jenkin HL, Howard IP (1998) Retinal and gravitational frames of reference in ambiguous figure recognition Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 39:S858
Jenkin HL, Jenkin M, Dyde RT, Harris LR (2004) Shape-from-shading depends on visual, gravitational, and body-orientation cues Perception 33:1453–1461
Jenkin HL, Dyde RT, Zacher JE, Zikovitz DC, Jenkin MR, Allison RS, Howard IP, Harris LR (2005) Relative role of visual and non-visual cues determining the direction of ‘up’: experiments in parabolic flight Acta Astronaut 56:1025–1032
Jolicoeur P (1985) The time to name disoriented natural objects Mem Cognit 13:289–303
Kaptein RG, Van Gisbergen JAM (2004) Interpretation of a discontinuity in the sense of verticality at large body tilt J Neurophysiol 91:2205–2214
Maki RH (1986) Naming and locating the tops of rotated pictures Can J Psychol 40:368–387
Mamassian P, Goutcher R (2001) Prior knowledge on the illumination position Cognition 81:B1–B9
Mamassian P, Kersten D (1996) Illumination, shading and the perception of local orientation Vision Res 36:2351–2367
Mars F, Vercher JL, Blouin J (2004) Perception of the vertical with a head-mounted visual frame during head tilt Ergonomics 47:1116–1130
Mast FW (2000) Does the world rock when the eyes roll? Swiss J Psychol 59:89–101
McMullen PA, Jolicoeur P (1992) Reference frame and effects of orientation of finding the tops of rotated objects J Exp Psychol: Human Perc Perf 3:807–820
Miller EF, Graybiel A (1971) Effect of gravitoinertial force on ocular counterrolling J Appl Physiol 31:697–700
Miller EF, Graybiel A (1972) Human counterrolling measured during eight hours of sustained body tilt Minerva Ostorinolaringol 24:247–252
Milner AD, Goodale MA (1995) The visual brain in action Oxford University Press Oxford
Mittelstaedt H (1983) A new solution to the problem of the subjective vertical Naturwissenschaften 70:272–281
Mittelstaedt H (1986) The subjective vertical as a function of visual and extraretinal cues Acta Psychol 63:63–85
Mittelstaedt H (1988) The information processing structure of the subjective vertical. A cybernetic bridge between its psychophysics and its neurobiology In: Marko H, Hauske G, Struppler A (ed) Processing structures for perception and action VCH Weinheim pp 217–263
Mittelstaedt H (1999) The role of the otoliths in perception of the vertical and in path integration Ann NY Acad Sci 871:334–344
Nyborg H (1980) Psychological differentiation in school children. Maturation, cognition and personality development. Psychological Reports Aarhus 5 University of Aarhus Denmark
Press WH (1988) Numerical recipes in C Cambridge University Press Cambridge, UK
Ramachandran VS (1988) The perception of shape from shading Nature 331:163–166
Rock I (1973) Orientation and form Academic New York
Rock I, Heimer W (1957) The effect of retinal and phenomenal orientation on the perception of form Am J Psychol 70:493–511
Rock I, Schreiber C, Ro T (1994) The dependence of two-dimensional shape perception on orientation Perception 23:1409–1426
Thompson P (1980) Margaret Thatcher: a new illusion Perception 9:483–484
Valentine T (1988) Upside-down faces: a review of the effect of inversion upon face recognition Br J Psychol 79(Pt 4):471–491
Van Beuzekom AD, Van Gisbergen JAM (2000) Properties of the internal representation of gravity inferred from spatial-direction and body-tilt estimates J Neurophysiol 84: 11–27
Wade SW, Curthoys IS (1997) The effect of ocular torsional position on perception of the roll-tilt of visual stimuli Vision Res 37:1071–1078
Wenderoth P, Hickey N (1993) Object and head orientation effects on symmetry perception defined by shape from shading Perception 22:1121–1130
Wexler M, Lamouret I, Droulez J (2001a) The stationarity hypothesis: an allocentric criterion in visual perception Vision Res 41:3023–3037
Wexler M, Panerai F, Lamouret I, Droulez J (2001b) Self-motion and the perception of stationary objects Nature 409:85–88
Witkin HA (1949) Perception of body position and the position of the visual field Psychol Monog 63:1–63
Acknowledgements
Supported by NASA Cooperative Agreement NCC9-58 with the National Space Biomedical Research Institute, the Canadian Space Agency, and grants from the Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada to L.R. Harris and M.R. Jenkin. We would like to thank Ian Howard, Carolee Orme and Chuck Oman for their comments on earlier versions of the manuscript.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Dyde, R.T., Jenkin, M.R. & Harris, L.R. The subjective visual vertical and the perceptual upright. Exp Brain Res 173, 612–622 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00221-006-0405-y
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00221-006-0405-y