Table 2:

Comparison between the fitting statistics for the inactive state RTDs of the data and of model results, for each recording session

DataSimulations
Fish-sessionp valueNumebr of statesEmbedded Image Embedded Image
(s)
p valueNumber of statesEmbedded Image Embedded Image
(s)
A-10.27490.30473.140.31 ± 0.3443.74 ± 6.230.41±0.34473.21 ± 81.43
A-20.37300.27523.300.31 ± 0.3232.34 ± 4.490.33 ± 0.22466.15 ± 77.94
A-30.03510.24773.870.25 ± 0.3168.21 ± 7.470.34 ± 0.20508.46 ± 64.71
A-40.59930.29529.590.20 ± 0.2880.59 ± 8.660.38 ± 0.21542.10 ± 75.30
A-50.45670.47609.230.24 ± 0.3067.76 ± 7.010.38 ± 0.27542.22 ± 66.51
A-60.67310.52524.040.27 ± 0.3136.82 ± 5.240.44 ± 0.37414.97 ± 68.59
A-70.71720.42439.880.17 ± 0.2572.38 ± 8.140.32 ± 0.20408.15 ± 60.43
B-10.651801.0032.180.47 ± 0.2673.70 ± 6.620.56 ± 0.1753.33 ± 7.42
B-20.77990.9325.050.44 ± 0.2555.30 ± 7.720.62 ± 0.2442.12 ± 7.21
B-30.51810.7734.650.54 ± 0.2671.53 ± 6.520.71 ± 0.2240.26 ± 5.23
B-40.781090.6134.360.49 ± 0.2556.20 ± 6.220.57 ± 0.1951.83 ± 8.30
B-50.37350.5534.550.44 ± 0.2536.89 ± 5.890.58 ± 0.3040.94 ± 9.41
B-60.91720.8477.180.49 ± 0.2576.27 ± 7.750.57 ± 0.1573.89 ± 10.15
B-70.69770.4550.970.45 ± 0.2470.58 ± 7.700.54 ± 0.1658.93 ± 8.74
B-80.75340.3371.890.47 ± 0.2761.93 ± 7.360.55 ± 0.1863.61 ± 10.50
  • The p values are from two sample Kolmogorov-Smirnov tests between the empirical RTD and the best fit stretched exponential distribution. α and < t > are parameters of the stretched exponential distribution of Equation 6. Simulation results are formatted as mean ± SD, as obtained from 100 iterations of Equation 1, driven by the s(t) associated with each recording session.