Type 10A phosphodiesterase (PDE10A) is highly expressed in the striatum, in striatonigral and striatopallidal medium-sized spiny neurons (MSNs), which express D1 and D2 dopamine receptors, respectively. PDE10A inhibitors have pharmacological and behavioral effects suggesting an antipsychotic profile, but the cellular bases of these effects are unclear. We analyzed the effects of PDE10A inhibition in vivo by immunohistochemistry, and imaged cAMP, cAMP-dependent protein kinase A (PKA), and cGMP signals with biosensors in mouse brain slices. PDE10A inhibition in mouse striatal slices produced a steady-state increase in intracellular cAMP concentration in D1 and D2 MSNs, demonstrating that PDE10A regulates basal cAMP levels. Surprisingly, the PKA-dependent AKAR3 phosphorylation signal was strong in D2 MSNs, whereas D1 MSNs remained unresponsive. This effect was also observed in adult mice in vivo since PDE10A inhibition increased phospho-histone H3 immunoreactivity selectively in D2 MSNs in the dorsomedial striatum. The PKA-dependent effects in D2 MSNs were prevented in brain slices and in vivo by mutation of the PKA-regulated phosphorylation site of 32 kDa dopamine- and cAMP-regulated phosphoprotein (DARPP-32), which is required for protein phosphatase-1 inhibition. These data highlight differences in the integration of the cAMP signal in D1 and D2 MSNs, resulting from stronger inhibition of protein phosphatase-1 by DARPP-32 in D2 MSNs than in D1 MSNs. This study shows that PDE10A inhibitors share with antipsychotic medications the property of activating preferentially PKA-dependent signaling in D2 MSNs.
- biosensor imaging
- protein kinase
The striatum is mainly composed of medium-sized spiny neurons that express either dopamine D1 receptors or dopamine D2 receptors. Their activity is associated with either the initiation of movement or action suppression, respectively. Biosensor imaging revealed that pharmacological inhibition of type 10A phosphodiesterase increased cAMP levels in D1 and D2 neurons in the same manner, but only D2 neurons exhibited an increase in the protein kinase A-mediated phosphorylation level. This effect resulted from an asymmetrical regulation of phosphatases by DARPP-32. D2 neurons are thus more prone to respond to a tonic cAMP signal than D1 neurons, a property that may explain how phosphodiesterase 10A inhibitors produced antipsychotic-like behavioral effects. This D1/D2 imbalance may also be critical for reward-mediated learning and action selection.
Schizophrenia is a devastating psychiatric disease, which results in persistent cognitive and emotional impairments. Type 10A phosphodiesterase (PDE10A) inhibitors were recently proposed as a treatment for schizophrenia (Kehler and Nielsen, 2011; Chappie et al., 2012); however, their cellular mechanisms of action remain unclear with respect to their putative therapeutic effects. PDE10A is highly and almost exclusively expressed in medium-sized spiny neurons (MSNs) of the striatum (Seeger et al., 2003; Coskran et al., 2006; Heiman et al., 2008; Lakics et al., 2010; Kelly et al., 2014). MSNs are divided into two categories based on their expression of dopamine receptors and their sites of projection, as follows: MSNs projecting to the substantia nigra highly express dopamine D1 receptors (hereafter termed D1 MSNs); whereas, MSNs projecting to the external globus pallidus highly express adenosine A2A and dopamine D2 receptors (hereafter termed D2 MSNs; Gerfen et al., 1990; Le Moine and Bloch, 1995; Bertran-Gonzalez et al., 2008; Matamales et al., 2009). The high expression of PDE10A in MSNs, and its interaction with the scaffold protein AKAP150 (A-kinase anchoring protein 150), protein kinase A (PKA), PSD-95, and NMDA receptor suggests an important role in modulating the spread of the synaptic cAMP signals into the cell body (Russwurm et al., 2015).
Besides PDE10A, striatal neurons express a number of specific signaling proteins that markedly differ from those in other brain regions (Girault, 2012), and that determine the characteristics of the cAMP/PKA signaling pathway (Castro et al., 2013). Among these specific proteins, DARPP-32 (32-kDa dopamine and cAMP-regulated phosphoprotein) is a multifunctional protein regulating phosphatase and kinase activities: for example, when DARPP-32 is phosphorylated at threonine 34 residue (Thr34) by PKA, it becomes a potent inhibitor of serine/threonine protein phosphatase-1 (PP-1; Hemmings et al., 1984; Svenningsson et al., 2004), increasing the duration of PKA-dependent signals (Castro et al., 2013).
Classical and atypical antipsychotic agents share the property of inhibiting D2 receptors and thus, in the striatum, increase PKA-dependent phosphorylation selectively in D2 MSNs (Bateup et al., 2008; Bertran-Gonzalez et al., 2008, 2009). In contrast, psychostimulants, which are psychotomimetic, activate many signaling responses in D1 MSNs (Bateup et al., 2008; Bertran-Gonzalez et al., 2008, 2009). PDE10A inhibitors were shown to increase cAMP levels in the striatum (Schmidt et al., 2008) and could be expected to mimic the effects of both antipsychotic and psychotomimetic compounds. We used biosensor imaging to precisely analyze the effects of PDE10A inhibitors on cAMP/PKA signaling at the level of individual D1 and D2 MSNs. Our work revealed that although PDE10A inhibition increased intracellular cAMP levels in both D1 and D2 MSNs, the downstream consequences at the level of PKA targets were profoundly different: the cAMP signal resulting from PDE10A inhibition strongly increased PKA-dependent phosphorylation in D2 MSNs, whereas D1 MSNs remained mostly unaffected. Further analyses showed that the difference required DARPP-32-dependent regulation of phosphatase activity in D1 and D2 MSNs.
Materials and Methods
Animals were housed under standardized conditions with a 12 h light/dark cycle, stable temperature (22 ± 1ºC), controlled humidity (55 ± 10%), and food and water available ad libitum. Homozygous mice expressing DARPP-32 with the T34A or T75A mutation (Svenningsson et al., 2003) were obtained by crossing heterozygous mice, on a mixed C57BL6/J-Sv129 background (a gift of Dr. P. Greengard, The Rockefeller University, New York). Male Drd2-EGFP heterozygous mice (C57Bl6/J) were generated as described previously (Gong et al., 2003). Experiments were performed in accordance with the regulations under the control of the local ethic committee Charles Darwin C2EA - 05.
Live brain slice preparation
Brain slices were prepared from male mice that were 8–12 days of age. Coronal brain slices were cut with a VT1200S microtome. Slices were prepared in an ice-cold solution of the following composition (in mm): 125 NaCl, 0.4 CaCl2, 1 MgCl2, 1.25 NaH2PO4, 26 NaHCO3, 25 glucose, and 1 kynurenic acid, saturated with 5% CO2 and 95% O2. The slices were incubated in this solution for 30 min and then placed on a Millicell-CM membrane (Millipore) in culture medium (50% Minimum Essential Medium, 50% HBSS, 6.5 g/L glucose, penicillin-streptomycin; Invitrogen). We used the Sindbis virus as a vector to induce expression of the various biosensors after overnight incubation (Ehrengruber et al., 1999). The coding sequences of Epac-SH150 (Polito et al., 2013), AKAR2-NLS (Zhang et al., 2005), AKAR3 (Allen and Zhang, 2006), and cygnet2 (Honda et al., 2001) were inserted into the viral vector pSinRep5 (Invitrogen). The viral vector (∼5 × 105 particles per slice) was added, and slices were incubated overnight at 35°C under an atmosphere containing 5% CO2. Before the experiment, slices were incubated for 30 min in the recording solution (125 mm NaCl, 2 mm CaCl2, 1 mm MgCl2, 1.25 mm NaH2PO4, 26 mm NaHCO3, and 25 mm glucose, saturated with 5% CO2 and 95% O2). Recordings were performed with a continuous perfusion of the same solution at 32°C. MSNs constitute 95% of neurons in the striatum. Large neurons (smallest soma diameter, >14 µm), presumably cholinergic interneurons, were excluded.
Live brain slice imaging
For two-photon imaging, excitation was obtained using a Ti:sapphire laser (MaiTai HP; Spectra Physics) tuned at 850 nm for CFP excitation. Galvanometric scanners (model 6210; Cambridge Technology) were used for raster scanning, and a piezo-driven objective scanner (P-721 PIFOC; Physik Instrumente GmbH) was used for z-stack image acquisition. The system was controlled by MPscope software (Nguyen et al., 2006). The microscope was based on an Olympus BX51WI upright microscope with a 40× 0.8 numerical aperture (NA) or 60× 0.9 NA water-immersion objective. A two-photon emission filter was used to reject residual excitation light (E700 SP; Chroma Technology). A fluorescence cube containing 479/40 and 542/50 emission filters and a 506 nm dichroic beamsplitter (FF01-479/40, FF01-542/50 and FF506-Di02-25x36 Brightline Filters; Semrock) was used for the orthogonal separation of the two fluorescence signals. Two imaging channels (H9305 photomultipliers; Hamamatsu) were used for simultaneous detection of the two types of fluorescence emission. For each data point, an image stack of 30–40 images with a 0.5 µm interval was acquired.
Wide-field images were obtained with an Olympus BX50WI or BX51WI upright microscope with a 40× 0.8 NA water-immersion objective and an ORCA-AG Camera (Hamamatsu). Images were acquired with iVision (Biovision). The excitation and dichroic filters were D436/20 and 455dcxt. Signals were acquired by alternating the emission filters, HQ480/40 for CFP, and D535/40 for yellow fluorescent protein, with a filter wheel (Sutter Instruments). These filters were obtained from Chroma Technology.
No correction for bleed-through or direct excitation of the acceptor was applied, since this correction, while increasing the absolute amplitude of ratio changes, also increases the noise in the measurement (Ducros et al., 2009).
The biosensor chromophores are sensitive to nonspecific environmental disturbances. We used a mutated version of AKAR3 in which the threonine residue of the PKA phosphorylation site was replaced with an alanine residue (T391A) as a control. This AKAR3 (T391A) control sensor reported no ratio change in response to PDE10A inhibition in MSNs.
Images were analyzed with custom routines written in the IGOR Pro environment (Wavemetrics). The emission ratio was calculated for each pixel, as follows: F535/F480 for AKAR2-NLS and AKAR3, and F480/F535 for cygnet2 and Epac-SH150 sensors. The pseudocolor images display the ratio value coded in hue and the fluorescence of the preparation coded in intensity.
Two-photon imaging was used to separate individual neurons for a precise quantification of the amplitude of the response (Figs. 1, 2). Ratio measurements were performed on a series of 5–10 consecutive image from the image stack, centered on the cell body. With cytosolic biosensors, when visible, the nucleus was excluded from the measurement. Wide-field imaging (Figs. 3A–E) also allowed the unambiguous identification of D1 and D2 MSNs, provided that the infection level was kept low and no fluorescence overlap between neighboring neurons was observed. The optical cross-contamination resulting from out-of-focus light was evaluated by the final response to CGS 21680 and SKF-38393, applied sequentially: cells were rejected from analysis if the cross-contamination was >30%. For cGMP imaging (Fig. 3F,G), the data were quantified as relative ratio change.
Quantifications of cAMP signals
The amplitudes of responses were quantified for each neuron as the fractional change in ratio from its own baseline and maximal final ratio response. Responses obtained from MSNs of the same type were averaged for each experiment (i.e., brain slice).
The free cAMP concentrations were estimated with the Epac-SH150 biosensor from the ratio measurement using the Hill equation, with a Kd of 4.4 µm and a Hill coefficient of 0.77, as determined from Polito et al. (2013). The maximal response corresponding to biosensor saturation (Rmax) was determined for each neuron at the end of the recording. This level was obtained by applying 13 µm forskolin (FSK), a dose known to be sufficient to maximally phosphorylate the highly sensitive probe AKAR3 in MSNs. For cAMP biosensors, this Rmax value was obtained with 200 µm IBMX and 13 µm forskolin.
The baseline cAMP level in control conditions was evaluated by inhibiting adenylyl cyclases with 200 µm SQ22536, which resulted in a ratio decrease, measured in wide-field microscopy, of −4.0% of the maximal ratio change. This decrease in baseline ratio was −4.9 ± 0.7 and −3.3 ± 0.7 (n = 6, p < 0.05 with paired Student’s t test), respectively, in D1 and D2 MSNs. Assuming that adenylyl cyclase inhibition effectively decreased cAMP levels down to a level sufficient to reach the minimal ratio level (Rmin), these values suggest a baseline cAMP concentration in a range of ∼100 nm.
Tissue preparation and immunofluorescence
Mice, 8-10 weeks old, were treated with the drug for 60 min and then rapidly anesthetized with pentobarbital (500 mg/kg, i.p.; Sanofi-Aventis) and were transcardially perfused with 4% (w/v) paraformaldehyde in 0.1 m PBS, pH 7.5. Brains were post-fixed overnight in the same solution and stored at 4°C. The 30-μm-thick sections were cut with a vibratome and stored at −20°C in a solution containing 30% (v/v) ethylene glycol, 30% (v/v) glycerol and 0.1 m sodium phosphate buffer, until they were processed for immunofluorescence. Sections were processed as described in Bertran-Gonzalez et al. (2009). Sodium fluoride 0.1 mm was included in all buffers and incubation solutions. Histone H3 phosphorylation was revealed with a rabbit polyclonal antibody against phospho-Ser10-H3 (1:1000; catalog #06570; Millipore) the specificity of which was confirmed in a previous study (Jordi et al., 2013). GFP was detected using chicken antibody against GFP (1:500; catalog #A10262; Life Technologies). Following incubation with primary antibodies, sections were rinsed three times for 10 min in TBS and incubated for 45–60 min with goat Cy3-coupled (1:500; Jackson ImmunoResearch; Fig. 5) and goat A488 (1:500; Life Technologies; Fig. 6). Sections were rinsed for 10 min twice in Tris-buffered saline and twice in Tris buffer (0.25 m Tris) before mounting in 1,4-diazabicyclo-[2. 2. 2]-octane (Sigma-Aldrich).
Single-labeled images (Fig. 6) were obtained with a Zeiss LSM780 Confocal Microscope. Double-labeled images (Fig. 5) were obtained with a Leica TCS SPE Confocal Microscope with laser lines at 496 and 561 nm, acquiring in the 501–539 nm and 570–660 nm bands. All parameters were held constant for all sections from the same experiment.
Data were analyzed with SPSS statistical software version 22.0. Normality in variable distributions and homogeneity of variances across groups were assessed with the Shapiro–Wilk and Levene tests, respectively. Variables that failed any of these tests were analyzed with nonparametric statistics using the Kruskal–Wallis ANOVA on ranks followed by Mann–Whitney rank sum test with a Dunn–Sidak adjustment test for pairwise multiple comparisons. Variables that passed the normality test were analyzed with ANOVA followed by Bonferroni post hoc test for multiple comparisons or by Student’s t test for comparing two groups. Paired data were analyzed with a Student’s t test. A p value of <0.05 was used as a cutoff for statistical significance. All error bars represent the SEM; n indicates the number of experiments (i.e., the number of brain slices tested), with at least four neurons of each type in each experiment. All experiments were performed on at least three different brain slices from at least two animals.
SKF-38393 hydrobromide, CGS 21680 hydrochloride, 1-methyl-3-isobutylxanthine (IBMX), rolipram, papaverine, roscovitine, okadaic acid, cantharidin, gabazine, CNQX, APV, and forskolin were obtained from Tocris Cookson. TTX was from Latoxan. PQ-10, MP-10, and roflumilast were a gift from Janssen Pharmaceuticals. TP-10 was provided by Pfizer through the Compound Transfer Program.
PDE10A inhibition reveals a tonic cAMP production in both D1 and D2 MSNs
Since both D1 and D2 MSNs express high levels of PDE10A protein (Nishi et al., 2008), we used biosensor-imaging approaches to compare the effects of PDE10A inhibition on the cAMP/PKA signaling cascade in D1 and D2 MSNs. First, we monitored changes in intracellular cAMP concentrations with two-photon microscopy in striatal brain slices expressing Epac-SH150. At the end of every experiment, an agonist of adenosine A2A receptors (CGS 21680, 1 µm) and an agonist of dopamine D1 receptors (SKF-38393, 1 µm) were applied sequentially, triggering a positive cAMP response in D2 and D1 MSNs, respectively, thereby functionally identifying MSN subtypes. The final application of the general adenylyl cyclase activator FSK (13 µm) together with the nonselective phosphodiesterase inhibitor IBMX (200 µm) produced the maximal ratio response used for normalization.
PDE10A inhibition with PQ-10 (100 nm) increased cAMP levels in all MSNs (Fig. 1A) in a dose-dependent manner. This dose dependency was not statistically different between D1 and D2 MSNs (Fig. 1B). At the highest doses (1 and 2 µm), cAMP responses reached ∼35% of the maximal response to FSK plus IBMX, which corresponds to a concentration of free cAMP of ∼2 µm (see Materials and Methods for details on the estimation of cAMP concentrations). These experiments showed that, in the basal condition, cAMP is tonically produced in striatal slices and that PDE10A contributes significantly to its degradation.
PDE10A inhibition increases the phosphorylation of a PKA target exclusively in D2 MSNs
We then analyzed the effects of PQ-10 on PKA-dependent phosphorylation levels using the PKA biosensor AKAR3. As for cAMP imaging, MSNs were identified at the end of each experiment by their response to either A2A or D1 receptor agonist. The maximal AKAR3 response was elicited by FSK. Although the increase in free cAMP concentration was similar in D1 and D2 MSNs (Fig. 1A,B), the resulting PKA-dependent phosphorylation levels were completely different (Fig. 1C): PQ-10 (100 nm) strongly increased the emission ratio of AKAR3 in the D2 MSNs (66 ± 4% of the maximal response to FSK, n = 4); whereas, in D1 MSNs, the ratio remained at a much lower level (6 ± 2%). These results indicated a significantly higher phosphorylation of AKAR3 in D2 than in D1 MSNs in response to PQ-10. The effect of PQ-10 on AKAR3 ratio in D2 MSNs was steeply dose dependent with a maximal effect reached at <100 nm (Fig. 1D). In stark contrast to D2 MSNs, even high doses of PQ-10, which increased cAMP to the same levels in D1 and D2 MSNs (Fig. 1B), only produced a very small effect on AKAR3 phosphorylation in D1 MSNs (Fig. 1D). These experiments thus revealed a much stronger effect of cAMP on PKA-dependent phosphorylation in D2 than in D1 MSNs.
PDE10A may be addressed differentially in the cytoplasm and membranes (Kotera et al., 2004; Charych et al., 2010), and cAMP dynamics could differ in subcellular domains of different geometry, like dendrites (Castro et al., 2010). An increase in AKAR3 ratio was observed exclusively in the dendritic branches that responded to the A2A agonist, whereas dendrites, which responded to the D1 agonist, showed no response to 100 nm PQ-10 (Fig. 2A). This is consistent with other biosensor recordings in which dendrites of D1 MSNs also exhibited no baseline response to PDE10A inhibition (Yagishita et al., 2014).
Once activated, PKA can translocate to the nucleus and phosphorylate a number of nuclear proteins. We examined whether the differential response to PQ-10 also existed in the nucleus. Using the nuclear AKAR2-NLS biosensor, we found that PDE10A inhibition induced a strong ratio increase in D2 MSNs, while D1 MSNs remained unresponsive (Fig. 2B). These results showed that PQ-10 efficiently increased AKAR3 phosphorylation in the cytoplasm and nucleus of D2 but not D1 MSNs, whereas they had a similar and selective effect on cAMP production in the two cell types.
PDE10A inhibition effects are antagonized by D2 receptors and independent of A2A receptors
One feature of striatopallidal MSNs is the coexpression of D2 dopamine and A2A adenosine receptors, negatively and positively coupled to adenylyl cyclase, respectively (Schiffmann et al., 1991; Schiffmann and Vanderhaeghen, 1993; Ferré et al., 1997; Svenningsson et al., 1999; Bateup et al., 2008; Bertran-Gonzalez et al., 2009). Application of the D2 receptor agonist quinpirole (1 µm) completely reversed the PQ-10-induced AKAR3 response in D2 MSNs, monitored with wide-field microscopy (Fig. 3A). Application of quinpirole alone had no effect on the basal AKAR3 ratio but prevented positive responses to PQ-10 in D2 MSNs with 11 ± 3% (n = 5) of the maximal FSK response in D2 MSNs compared with 9 ± 2% in D1 MSNs (Fig. 3B). These results showed that the activation of D2 receptors opposed the effect of PQ-10 in D2 MSNs, most likely via Gi-mediated inhibition of the tonic adenylyl cyclase activity. These experiments also further confirmed that the positive AKAR3 response to PQ-10 was specific to MSNs expressing D2 receptors.
We then determined whether the effect selectivity for D2 MSNs was a particular property of PQ-10 or was also observed with other PDE10A inhibitors. The effects of MP-10 (100 nm) and papaverine (1 µm) on AKAR3 ratio were similar (Fig. 3C,D), inducing an AKAR3 ratio increase selectively in D2 MSNs. TP-10 also produced the same response profile (see below). In contrast, PDE4 inhibitors (rolipram, 100 nm, n = 4; and roflumilast, 1 µm, n = 4) had no effect on basal AKAR3 ratio (data not shown).
As D2 MSNs express adenosine A2A receptors, we examined whether the tonic presence of extracellular adenosine in our brain slice preparation activated adenylyl cyclase and might be responsible for the positive response to PQ-10 recorded specifically in these MSNs. When A2A receptors were blocked with SCH 58261 (100 nm), PQ-10 still elicited positive responses in D2 MSNs (Fig. 3E). In contrast, SCH 58261 blocked the responses to the A2A agonist CGS 21680 (data not shown). These results showed that tonic activation of A2A receptors was not required for the phosphorylation response to PQ-10 in D2 MSNs. We then examined whether the phosphorylation signal involved endogenous neuronal activity, or required the glutamate and GABA which may be present in the brain slice. This was not the case since, in the presence of blockers of voltage-gated sodium channels (TTX, 100 nm), calcium channels (CdCl2, 200 µm), non-NMDA receptors (CNQX, 10 µm), NMDA receptors (APV, 10 µm), and GABAA receptors (SR 95531, 1 µm), the selective effect of PQ-10 on D2 MSNs was still present (25 ± 3 vs 71 ± 10 of the maximal FSK response in D1 and D2 MSNs, respectively; n = 3, paired Student’s t test; data not shown).
Since PDE10A also degrades cGMP and PDE10A inhibition was shown to increase cGMP levels and affect synaptic transmission in vivo (Siuciak et al., 2006; Schmidt et al., 2008; Grauer et al., 2009; Padovan-Neto et al., 2015), we used wide-field imaging of the cGMP biosensor cygnet2 (Honda et al., 2001) to determine whether PDE10A also regulated cGMP in MSNs. PQ-10 (1 µm) had no effect on the baseline cGMP levels (n = 4, p = 0.44, one-sample Student’s t test). In addition, PQ-10 (1 µm) had no effect on the cGMP steady-state level obtained with the nitric oxide (NO) donor DEANO (Diethylamine nitric oxide, 100 µm; n = 6; Fig. 3F), while the nonspecific phosphodiesterase inhibitor IBMX produced a significant ratio increase. These results indicated that in our conditions PDE10A inhibition does not significantly affect cGMP levels in MSNs.
Different responsiveness of D1 and D2 MSNs is abolished by protein phosphatase inhibition
The difference between D1 and D2 MSNs in the phosphorylation level of AKAR3 could result from differences in the rate of phosphorylation by PKA, dephosphorylation by phosphatases, or both. A difference in PKA levels is unlikely because immunostaining of catalytic subunits in the striatum did not reveal major differences between cells (Yang et al., 2014). Since AKAR3 biosensor responses to PKA activation are reversed by the action of endogenous protein phosphatases (Gervasi et al., 2007), we investigated the role of protein phosphatases in the different responsiveness of D1 and D2 MSNs to PDE10A inhibitors.
Cantharidin (30 µm), a nonselective inhibitor of PP-1 and PP-2A, had no effect by itself on the AKAR3 emission ratio (Fig. 4A). However, when PQ-10 (100 nm) was applied in the bath (Fig. 4A), the AKAR3 ratio increased in virtually all D1 and D2 MSNs (79 ± 10% of the FSK response, n = 5). Since these responses did not return to the baseline after drug washout, it was impossible to distinguish between D1 and D2 MSNs, and all MSNs were pooled (Fig. 4F, gray color bar). To identify which phosphatase subtype was involved in the response, we used fostriecin (200 nm), a selective inhibitor of PP-2A (Swingle et al., 2009). We observed no effect of this inhibitor alone on basal AKAR3 ratio, and it did not alter the selective response to PQ-10 in D2 MSNs (Fig. 4B). These results showed that PP-2A was not involved in the different responsiveness of D1/D2 and rather suggested the involvement of PP-1.
PP-1 regulation by DARPP-32 is necessary for the selective responsiveness of D2 MSNs to PDE10A inhibition
DARPP-32 is expressed at high levels in both types of MSNs and constitutes a powerful and specific inhibitor of PP-1 when it is phosphorylated at Thr34 (Hemmings et al., 1984). We used a knock-in mutant mouse line in which Thr34 is replaced by an alanine (T34A; Svenningsson et al., 2003). In T34A mice, the effect of PQ-10 on AKAR3 was strongly reduced in D2 MSNs (14 ± 2%, n = 13, 6 mice), whereas, as in wild-type mice, no effect was observed in D1 MSNs (8 ± 1%; Fig. 4C,E). Normal responses to D1 or A2A stimulations were observed at the end of the recording. The phosphatase inhibitor cantharidin unmasked the response to PQ-10 in all MSNs of the DARPP-32 T34A mice (Fig. 4F), confirming that, upon inhibition of PP-1, PQ-10 was still capable of increasing the AKAR3 response in these mutant mice. Together, these results show that the inhibition of PP-1 by DARPP-32 is necessary for the difference in responsiveness of D1 and D2 MSNs.
DARPP-32 also inhibits PKA activity when it is phosphorylated at Thr75 by Cdk5 (Bibb et al., 1999; Nishi et al., 2000). A higher phosphorylation level of this residue in D1 MSNs could be responsible for a weaker PKA activity in these neurons. However, in a knock-in mutant mouse line with a Thr75-to-alanine mutation (DARPP-32 T75A; Svenningsson et al., 2003), the profile of the AKAR3 response to PQ-10 was the same as that in wild-type mice (Fig. 4D,E). Moreover, the Cdk5 inhibitor roscovitine (10 µm) had no effect on the D1/D2 imbalance in the response to PQ-10 (Fig. 4G), ruling out the involvement of Thr75 of DARPP-32 as a critical determinant for the lack of PQ-10-dependent AKAR3 responses in D1 MSNs.
In vivo PDE10A inhibition selectively induces histone H3 phosphorylation in D2 MSNs of the dorsomedial striatum
Our results showed a marked difference in the responsiveness of D1 and D2 MSNs to PDE10A inhibitor in slices. We then investigated whether the D1/D2 imbalance could also be observed in vivo by monitoring phospho-histone H3 at Ser10 residue (PH3), a substrate for several protein kinases including PKA (Nowak and Corces, 2004). We used transgenic mice in which D2 MSNs are identified by GFP fluorescence (drd2-EGFP mice; Gong et al., 2003; Bertran-Gonzalez et al., 2008) and monitored PH3 by immunofluorescence. In these in vivo experiments, we studied the effects of TP-10 (3 mg/kg, i.p.), a PDE10A inhibitor known to produce clear behavioral effects (Schmidt et al., 2008). At this dose, TP-10 induced a large increase in the number of PH3-positive neurons in the striatum 60 min after treatment, compared with vehicle treatment. Quantification showed that 93% of the PH3-immunoreactive neurons were GFP positive (D2 MSNs) in the dorsomedial striatum, whereas in lateral parts of the striatum both GFP-negative and GFP-positive D2 MSNs exhibited PH3 immunoreactivity (Fig. 5A–C). In the nucleus accumbens, a sparse and irregular labeling was observed in the shell region, and no immunoreactivity was detected in the core. In all striatal regions, no PH3 immunoreactivity was observed in large neurons expressing low levels of GFP, presumably corresponding to cholinergic interneurons.
Since in vivo the selective effects of TP-10 on D2 MSNs was observed in the dorsomedial, but not the dorsolateral striatum, we performed a set of experiments in brain slices to compare medial and lateral dorsal striatum using the same inhibitor. The AKAR3 responses to TP-10 (100 nm) were similar, with a strong effect of TP-10 in D2 MSNs but not in D1 MSNs (Fig. 5D,E). Altogether, these experiments showed that PDE10A exerts selective effects on D2 MSNs in striatal slices and that this selectivity is maintained in vivo in the dorsomedial striatum.
DARPP-32 is required for the in vivo effects of TP-10
Our experiments in striatal slices showed that the inhibition of PP-1 by DARPP-32 phosphorylated on Thr34 was necessary for the selective responsiveness to PDE10A inhibition on AKAR phosphorylation. We then investigated whether the effects of PDE10A inhibition in vivo also depended on the phosphorylation of DARPP-32 at Thr34. T34A knock-in and wild-type littermates were treated with TP-10 (3 mg/kg, i.p.) or vehicle (four animals for each condition) and brain sections analyzed by immunofluorescence for PH3 60 min after injection. Whereas wild-type littermates strongly responded to TP-10, the effect of TP-10 was completely abolished in the DARPP-32 T34A mutant mice in all regions of the striatum (Fig. 6A,B). These experiments clearly showed that Thr34 in DARPP-32 was required for the effects of PDE10A inhibitor on D1 and D2 MSNs in both the dorsomedial and dorsolateral striatum in vivo.
Our study shows that although PDE10A is expressed and functional in all types of MSNs, its inhibition in striatal slices produces a higher PKA-dependent protein phosphorylation response in D2 MSNs than in D1 MSNs. We provide evidence that this difference is present in all striatal regions in brain slices and in the dorsomedial striatum of adult mice in vivo. Moreover, we show that the regulation of PP-1 activity by DARPP-32 is required for these specific effects of PDE10A inhibitors. These observations provide novel insights into the regulation of the cAMP/PKA pathway in the two populations of MSNs and the possible antipsychotic action of PDE10A inhibitors.
PDE10A is one of the enzymes specifically enriched in the striatum (Seeger et al., 2003; Coskran et al., 2006; Heiman et al., 2008; Lakics et al., 2010; Kelly et al., 2014), and the data reported here show that PDE10A plays an important role in degrading basally produced cAMP in both D1 and D2 MSNs. MSNs thus contrast with pyramidal neurons of the prefrontal cortex in which basal cAMP is predominantly controlled by PDE4 (Castro et al., 2010). Although PDE4B is also expressed in D2 MSNs (Nishi et al., 2008), biosensor imaging of the somatic cytoplasm did not reveal significant effects of its inhibition in MSNs in our conditions.
PDE10A inhibition showed no effect on basal or stimulated cGMP production. A similar lack of effect of PDE10A inhibitors on cGMP has already been reported in brain slice preparations (Nishi et al., 2008). PDE10A thus differs from PDE1 and PDE2, other dual-specificity PDEs expressed in MSNs, which were shown in striatal homogenates to be the major PDEs involved in the control of cGMP levels (Russwurm et al., 2015). Using biosensor-imaging techniques, PDE2 was also shown to be the main PDE that regulated stimulated cGMP, while also regulating cAMP in a cGMP-dependent manner (Polito et al., 2013). In vivo, PDE10A inhibition was shown to increase cGMP levels and to affect synaptic transmission (Siuciak et al., 2006; Schmidt et al., 2008; Grauer et al., 2009; Padovan-Neto et al., 2015), and why this effect was not observed in brain slices remains to be determined. One hypothesis to explain this discrepancy might be that, in vivo, PDE10A inhibitors recruit nitric oxide synthase-positive striatal interneurons through a global increase in network activity.
While D1 and D2 MSNs share a number of cellular features, more detailed studies revealed subtle differences (Valjent et al., 2009), such as different excitability profiles (Gertler et al., 2008; Threlfell et al., 2009). Differences were also reported at the level of PKA-dependent phosphorylation of GABAA receptors and DARPP-32, which were higher in D2 MSNs than in D1 MSNs (Janssen et al., 2009; Nishi et al., 2008). Our work reveals a possible basis for these D1/D2 differences, which lies at the level of DARPP-32-mediated PP-1 regulation. In D1 MSNs, the Thr34 of DARPP-32 is in a lower phosphorylation state than in D2 MSNs and, thus, the PP-1 activity reverts PKA target sites to the dephophorylated state (Fig. 7). This hypothesis implies that a powerful mechanism prevents DARPP-32 from remaining phosphorylated on the Thr34 position selectively in D1 MSNs. Thr34 residue is efficiently dephosphorylated by both PP-2A and PP-2B (but not by PP-1; Nishi et al., 1999), and further work is needed to analyze the possible differences in PP2A and PP2B activities between D1 and D2 MSNs. In contrast to tonic cAMP levels induced by PDE10A inhibition, cAMP signals elicited by D1 receptor stimulation lead to a phosphorylation of T34 and inhibition of PP-1 (Bateup et al., 2008), an effect that is also clearly visible on transient responses to dopamine stimulations (Castro et al., 2013). This is consistent with the observation that, in D1 MSNs, PDE10A inhibition only affects PKA-dependent modulation of synaptic transmission when cAMP production is stimulated (Mango et al., 2014). This nonlinearity in D1 MSNs may improve the detection of powerful but brief events such as the phasic dopamine signal associated with reward and novelty (Schultz, 2010), while filtering out smaller fluctuations in basal cAMP level.
In contrast, in D2 MSNs DARPP-32 is phosphorylated on the Thr34 residue, as previously demonstrated (Nishi et al., 2008). In this situation, a moderate cAMP signal, such as that produced by PDE10A inhibition, activates PKA, and, because PP-1 is inhibited, PKA targets remain phosphorylated. Indeed, when DARPP-32 bears the T34A mutation and can no longer inhibit PP-1, D2 MSNs fail to respond to PDE10A inhibition (Fig. 7).
Further work is needed to analyze the possible differences in PP-2A and PP-2B activities between D1 and D2 MSNs that may contribute to the higher level of DARPP-32 phosphorylation on Thr34.
Another potential player in the D1/D2 differences is the phosphorylation of DARPP-32 on Thr75, which is catalyzed by Cdk5 and is responsible for PKA inhibition (Bibb et al., 1999). Since Thr75 is dephosphorylated by a PKA-activated form of PP-2A containing the B56 subunit (Ahn et al., 2007), it could contribute to a hypersensitive feedforward loop. However, this mechanism did not appear to be critical for PDE10A responses in D2 MSNs, since we found no alteration of these responses in DARPP-32 T75A knock-in mutant mice.
The increased responsiveness of D2 MSNs at the level of PKA signaling is opposed in vivo by the activity of D2 receptors: the simple blockade of these receptors by D2 antagonists strongly activates cAMP-dependent phosphorylation (Håkansson et al., 2006; Bertran-Gonzalez et al., 2008, 2009; Bonito-Oliva et al., 2011; Valjent et al., 2011). Accordingly, haloperidol or clozapine selectively increases phospho-Thr34-DARPP-32 in D2 MSNs, and not in D1 MSNs (Bateup et al., 2008). This role of DARPP-32 in D2 MSNs is functionally important for some effects of antipsychotic drugs since conditional knockout of DARPP-32 in D2 MSNs leads to an increased locomotor activity and a strongly reduced catalepsy upon administration of D2 receptor inhibitors (Bateup et al., 2010). Our data show that the inhibition of PDE10A has functional effects that are similar to the blockade of D2 receptors since both potentiate the PKA pathway selectively in D2 MSNs. The particular sensitivity of D2 MSNs includes DARPP-32 Thr34 phosphorylation, which is more increased by PDE10A inhibitors in this population than in D1 MSNs (Nishi et al., 2008). Thus, hypersensitivity of DARPP-32 Thr34 phosphorylation could be a critical factor to account for the responsiveness of D2 MSNs to the blockade of either D2 receptors or PDE10A activity.
The cellular effects of PDE10A inhibition affect MSNs neuronal properties, which are integrated through the basal ganglia network. For example, PDE10A inhibition was shown to potentiate D-amphetamine-dependent dopaminergic neuromodulation in vivo (Sotty et al., 2009). In addition, PDE10A inhibition was shown to massively increase cGMP levels in vivo (Siuciak et al., 2006; Schmidt et al., 2008; Grauer et al., 2009), whereas, no effect was observed in brain slice preparations (Nishi et al., 2008; this study). This discrepancy possibly results from the recruitment of striatal NOergic interneurons through network activity resulting indirectly from PDE10A inhibition.
In vivo, the inhibition of PDE10A also selectively activates D2 MSNs in the medial striatum. Interestingly, this striatal subregion is innervated by prefrontal and cingulate cortices, which are involved in the limbic system, and dopamine neurons originating from the ventral tegmental area. D1 and D2 receptors exert contrasting roles selectively in the dorsomedial striatum during behavioral inhibition in the stop-signal task in rats (Eagle et al., 2011), and lesions of the dorsomedial striatum disrupt prepulse inhibition (Baldan Ramsey et al., 2011). This region is also involved in early motor learning and is required for the cataleptic effects of haloperidol and for amphetamine motor response sensitization (Durieux et al., 2012). Medial striatum thus appears as a limbic system-related region that could be affected in schizophrenia.
The differences observed between medial and lateral striatum likely involve network effects and differences in synaptic plasticity reported between these two striatal subregions (Lovinger, 2010), and further work should precisely show how these spatial differences are related to behavior. Our work nonetheless shows that the D1/D2 difference is present in brain slices in both medial and lateral striatum, and remains when network activity is blocked, showing that the D1/D2 difference is an intrinsic property of D1 and D2 MSNs. The in vivo effects of PDE10A inhibitors were totally abolished in T34-DARPP-32 mutant mice, confirming the role of the DARPP-32/PP-1 loop as the initial determinant of the positive PKA response obtained during PDE10A inhibition.
Further work is needed to determine whether the imbalance in PKA signal integration between D1 and D2 MSNs might be of interest to understand the pathophysiology of other diseases that affect neuromodulatory processes in basal ganglia such as Parkinson’s disease or Huntington’s disease (Threlfell and West, 2013).
Acknowledgments: Confocal microscopy and image analysis were performed at the Institut du Fer à Moulin Imaging Facilities and at the Institute of Biology Paris-Seine Imaging Facility (supported by the “Conseil Regional Ile-de France”, the French National Research Council, and Sorbonne University, UPMC, Paris 6).
1 The authors declare no competing financial interests.
3 This work was supported by grants from ATIP-Avenir (Inserm) and from the Agence Nationale de la Recherche, ANR-2010-JCJC-1412) to EV and ANR09-MNPS-014 to DH, and ERC to JAG. The groups of PV, and JAG and DH are part of the Bio-Psy Laboratory of Excellence.
- Received June 1, 2015.
- Revision received July 21, 2015.
- Accepted August 10, 2015.
- Copyright © 2015 Polito et al.
This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International, which permits unrestricted use, distribution and reproduction in any medium provided that the original work is properly attributed.